Re: Spark 3.1 branch cut 4th Dec?

2020-11-19 Thread Xiao Li
Correction: Merging the feature work after the branch cut should not be encouraged in general, although some committers did make some exceptions based on their own judgement. We should try to avoid merging the feature work after the branch cut. This email is a good reminder message. At least, we

Re: Spark 3.1 branch cut 4th Dec?

2020-11-19 Thread Xiao Li
We should try to merge the feature work after the branch cut. This should not be encouraged in general, although some committers did make some exceptions based on their own judgement. This email is a good reminder message. At least, we have two weeks ahead of the proposed branch cut date. I hope

jenkins downtime tomorrow evening/weekend

2020-11-19 Thread shane knapp ☠
i'm going to be upgrading jenkins to something more reasonable, and there will definitely be some downtime as i get things sorted. we should be back up and building by monday. shane -- Shane Knapp Computer Guy / Voice of Reason UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead

Re: Spark 3.1 branch cut 4th Dec?

2020-11-19 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Thank you for your volunteering! Since the previous branch-cuts were always soft-code freeze which allowed committers to merge to the new branches still for a while, I believe 1st December will be better for stabilization. Bests, Dongjoon. On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 3:50 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:

Spark 3.1 branch cut 4th Dec?

2020-11-19 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Hi all, I think we haven’t decided yet the exact branch-cut, code freeze and release manager. As we planned in https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html Early Dec 2020 Code freeze. Release branch cut Code freeze and branch cutting is coming. Therefore, we should finish if there are any