Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.0 (RC3)

Sure, no problem. Holden Karau 于2023年9月2日周六 22:10写道： > Can we delay the next RC cut until after Labor Day? > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 9:59 PM Yuanjian Li wrote: > >> Thank you for all the reports! >> The vote has failed. I plan to cut RC4 in two days. >> >> @Dipayan Dev I quickly skimmed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.0 (RC3)

Can we delay the next RC cut until after Labor Day? On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 9:59 PM Yuanjian Li wrote: > Thank you for all the reports! > The vote has failed. I plan to cut RC4 in two days. > > @Dipayan Dev I quickly skimmed through the > corresponding ticket, and it doesn't seem to be a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.0 (RC3)

Thank you for all the reports! The vote has failed. I plan to cut RC4 in two days. @Dipayan Dev I quickly skimmed through the corresponding ticket, and it doesn't seem to be a regression introduced in 3.5. Additionally, someone is asking if this is the same issue as SPARK-35279. @Yuming Wang I

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Python Stored Procedures

I have noticed an worthy discussion in the SPIP comments regarding the definition of "stored procedure" in the context of Spark, and I believe it is an important point to address. To provide some historical context, Sybase , a