n-binding). Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:37 AM Jungtaek Lim <
>>>>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>&g
et
>> >>>> SPIP doc
>> >>>> Discussion thread
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> >>>> [ ] +0
>> >>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks!
>> >>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>
--
Bartosz Konieczny
freelance data engineer
https://www.waitingforcode.com
https://github.com/bartosz25/
https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45511
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>> ps. The scope of the project is narrowed to the reader in this SPIP,
>>> since the writer requires us to consider more cases. We are planning on it.
>>>
>>
--
Bartosz Konieczny
freelance data engineer
https://www.waitingforcode.com
https://github.com/bartosz25/
https://twitter.com/waitingforcode
consistent demand on it, we could probably look into it and
> maybe introduce a new SQL function (which works only on streaming - that's
> probably a major blocker on introduction) on it.
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:03 AM Bartosz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>&
Hi,
I've been analyzing the watermark propagation added in the 3.5.0 recently
and had to return to the basics of watermarks. One question is still
unanswered in my head.
Why are the watermarks reserved to stateful queries? Can't they apply to
the filtering late date out only?
The reason is only
