+1, non-binding.
Thanks Dongjoon to drive this!
-Rui
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:10 AM Xinrong Meng wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you @Dongjoon Hyun !
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 6:33 AM beliefer wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> 在 2024-04-15 15:54:07，"Peter Toth" 写道：
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Wenchen Fan ezt írta
Congratulations! Well deserved!
-Rui
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 10:32 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> Congratulations to all! Well deserved!
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 10:16 PM Xiao Li wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Spark PMC is delighted to announce that we have voted to add one new
>> committer and
Thank you, Xinrong!
-Rui
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:05 AM Xinrong Meng
wrote:
> Thank you, Dongjoon!
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 9:04 AM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
>> Nice catch, Xiao!
>>
>> All `latest` tags are updated to v3.4.0 now.
>>
>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/spark/tags
>>
I am replying now and the default address is dev@spark.apache.org.
-Rui
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 4:27 AM Jia Fan wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I find that every time I reply to dev's mailing list, the default address
> of the reply is the sender of the mail, not dev@spark.apache.org. It
> caused
+1 to cut the branch starting from a workday!
Great to see this is happening!
Thanks Xinrong!
-Rui
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:21 PM 416161...@qq.com
wrote:
> +1, thank you Xinrong for driving this release!
>
> --
> Ruifeng Zheng
> ruife...@foxmail.com
>
>
Well deserved! Congrats!
-Rui
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:07 AM Xinrong Meng
wrote:
> Congratulations, Yikun! Well deserved.
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 9:36 PM John Zhuge wrote:
>
>> Congratulations, Yikun!
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 8:52 PM Senthil Kumar wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations Yikun
Thanks for the idea!
I am thinking that the usage of "combined = StructType( a.fields +
b.fields)" is still good because
1) it is not horrible to merge a and b in this way.
2) itself clarifies the intention which is merge two struct's fields to
construct a new struct
3) you also have room to
Congrats Xinrong!
-Rui
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 8:57 PM Xingbo Jiang wrote:
> Congratulations！
>
> Yuanjian Li 于2022年8月9日 周二20:31写道：
>
>> Congratulations, Xinrong!
>>
>> XiDuo You 于2022年8月9日 周二19:18写道：
>>
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>>> Haejoon Lee 于2022年8月10日周三 09:30写道：
>>> >
>>> > Congrats,
+1 for code freeze in Jan 2023 then QA period and then RC in Feb 2023.
-Rui
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:46 AM Chao Sun wrote:
> +1 for Jan 2023 (Code freeze) and Feb 2023 (RC).
>
> Chao
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:43 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > I'm also +1 for Feb. 2023 (RC) and Jan.
et us know if you don't agree.
-Rui
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:18 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> Yes. The current goal is a pure educational deprecation.
>
> So given the proposal:
> 1. existing users or users who do not care about catalog names in table
> identifiers can still use
ion and allow
>> users to use both APIs freely without any concern of uncertain
>> insupportability? I simply want to avoid the situation where the pure
>> educational deprecation itself becomes `Unneeded Deprecation` in the
>> community.
>>
>> Dongjoon.
>&g
I want to highlight in case I missed this in the original email:
The 4 API will not be deleted. They will just be marked as deprecated
annotations and we encourage users to use their alternatives.
-Rui
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:23 PM Rui Wang wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> Proposal:
4. There was existing practice that we deprecated CreateExternalTable API
when adding CreateTable API:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/7dcb4bafd02dd43213d3cc4a936c170bda56ddc5/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalog/Catalog.scala#L220
What do you think?
Thanks,
Rui Wang
13 matches
Mail list logo
