Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-18 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
I agree, Assignee has been used primarily to give recognition to the contributor who ended up submitting the patch which got merged. Typically jira's remain unassigned - even if it were to be assigned, it conveys no meaning or ownership or ongoing work : IMO it is equivalent to an unassigned

Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-18 Thread Sean Owen
I don't believe Assignee has ever been used for anything except to give a bit of informal credit to the person who drove most of the work on the issue, when it's resolved. If that's the question - does Assignee mean only that person can work on the issue? then no, it has never meant that. You say

Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-18 Thread Jungtaek Lim
(Actually the real world case was fixed somehow and I wouldn't like to point out a fixed one. I just would like to make sure what I think is correct and is considered as "consensus".) Just consider the case as simple - someone files two different JIRA issues for new features and assigns to

Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-18 Thread Sean Owen
I think it's OK to raise particular instances. It's hard for me to evaluate further in the abstract. I don't think we use Assignee much at all, except to kinda give credit when something is done. No piece of code or work can be solely owned by one person; this is just ASF policy. I think we've

Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-15 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Thanks for the input, Hyukjin! I have been keeping my own policy among all discussions I have raised - I would provide the hypothetical example closer to the actual one and avoid pointing out directly. The main purpose of the discussion is to ensure our policy / consensus makes sense, no more. I

Re: [DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-15 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
I remember I raised a similar issue a long time ago in the dev mailing list. I agree that setting no assignee makes sense in most of the cases, and also think we share similar thoughts about the assignee on umbrella JIRAs, followup tasks, the case when it's clear with a design doc, etc. It makes

[DISCUSS] assignee practice on committers+ (possible issue on preemption)

2021-02-14 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Hi devs, I'd like to raise a discussion and hear voices on the "assignee" practice on committers which may lead issues on preemption. I feel this is the one of major unfairnesses between contributors and committers if used improperly, especially when someone assigns themselves with multiple JIRA