Hi, all
We already have enough binding +1 now, so I'll close the vote (passed) in a
few hours.
If any problem, please let me know.
Thanks,
Takeshi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:59 AM Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> +1. Ran our regression tests for YARN and Hive, all look good.
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at
+1. Ran our regression tests for YARN and Hive, all look good.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:07 PM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.3.3.
>
> The vote is open until February 8 6:00PM (PST) and passes if a majority +1
> PMC votes
Thanks, Felix,
`-Pkubernetes-integration-tests` doesn't exist in branch-2.3?
Probably, it does in master/branch-2.4.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:51 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote:
> FYI: I've been working on stabilizing tests on streaming join and Kafka
> continuous mode (they're somewhat coupled with -
FYI: I've been working on stabilizing tests on streaming join and Kafka
continuous mode (they're somewhat coupled with - Kafka continuous mode
fails after porting back commit on streaming join) for branch-2.3, and I
think it's done. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23757
2019년 2월 11일 (월) 오전
The HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite is hard to make robust as it
downloads several huge Spark archives. It does try several mirrors and
fall back to archive.apache, but, still, plenty of scope for
occasional errors. We need to keep this restricted to only testing a
few recent Spark versions.
On
Zhuge
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 6:25 PM
To: Felix Cheung
Cc: Takeshi Yamamuro; Spark dev list
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC2)
Not me. I am running zulu8, maven, and hadoop-2.7.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 5:42 PM Felix Cheung
mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
On
February 9, 2019 5:25 AM
> *To:* Spark dev list
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC2)
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to check ` -Pdocker-integration-tests` for the JDBC
> integration tests.
> I run these tests, and then I checked if they are passed.
>
> On Sat, Feb
One test in SparkSubmitSuite is consistently failing for me. Anyone seeing that?
From: Takeshi Yamamuro
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 5:25 AM
To: Spark dev list
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC2)
Sorry, but I forgot to check ` -Pdocker
ix Cheung >
>
>> Nope, still only 1 binding vote ;)
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Mark Hamstra
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 7:30 PM
>> *To:* Marcelo Vanzin
>> *Cc:* Takeshi Yamamuro; Spark dev list
>> *Subject:*
Nope, still only 1 binding vote ;)
From: Mark Hamstra
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 7:30 PM
To: Marcelo Vanzin
Cc: Takeshi Yamamuro; Spark dev list
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC2)
There are 2. C'mon Marcelo, you can make it 3!
On Fri, Feb
Thanks for that info, all!
Yeah, sure. I'll wait for more votes until the next Wed.(PST)
based on the Xiao's suggestion.
Enjoy your vacation.
Best,
Takeshi
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 12:30 PM Mark Hamstra
wrote:
> There are 2. C'mon Marcelo, you can make it 3!
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:03 PM
There are 2. C'mon Marcelo, you can make it 3!
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:03 PM Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
> Hi Takeshi,
>
> Since we only really have one +1 binding vote, do you want to extend
> this vote a bit?
>
> I've been stuck on a few things but plan to test this (setting things
> up now), but
(There isn't a hard time limit on votes; they just need to give at
_least_ 72 hours. Indeed just wait until next week for more votes.)
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 7:07 PM Xiao Li wrote:
>
> Hi, Takeshi,
>
> Many PMCs are on vacation or offsite during this week. If possible, could you
> extend it to
Hi, Takeshi,
Many PMCs are on vacation or offsite during this week. If possible, could
you extend it to next Wed?
Happy Lunar New Year!
Xiao
Marcelo Vanzin 于2019年2月8日周五 下午5:03写道:
> Hi Takeshi,
>
> Since we only really have one +1 binding vote, do you want to extend
> this vote a bit?
>
>
Hi Takeshi,
Since we only really have one +1 binding vote, do you want to extend
this vote a bit?
I've been stuck on a few things but plan to test this (setting things
up now), but it probably won't happen before the deadline.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:07 PM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
>
> Please
Sorry for the last minute vote.
+1
2019년 2월 8일 (금) 오전 10:15, Takeshi Yamamuro 님이 작성:
> Thanks, all.
>
> Yea, I think we don't need to block the release, too.
>
> > Jungtaek
> Thanks! That is very helpful!
> If you find something, please let me know.
>
> Best,
> Takeshi
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019
Thanks, all.
Yea, I think we don't need to block the release, too.
> Jungtaek
Thanks! That is very helpful!
If you find something, please let me know.
Best,
Takeshi
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 1:10 AM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> +1 for 2.3.3 RC2.
>
> Thank you, Takeshi.
>
> And, +1 for 2.3.4 as 2.3.x
+1
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:10 AM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> +1 for 2.3.3 RC2.
>
> Thank you, Takeshi.
>
> And, +1 for 2.3.4 as 2.3.x EOL release.
>
> Cheers,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 6:48 AM Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> It wouldn't be wasted effort, as there is probably going to be a 2.3.4
+1 for 2.3.3 RC2.
Thank you, Takeshi.
And, +1 for 2.3.4 as 2.3.x EOL release.
Cheers,
Dongjoon.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 6:48 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> It wouldn't be wasted effort, as there is probably going to be a 2.3.4
> release before 2.3.x is EOL. At least, having reliable tests on
> Jenkins
It wouldn't be wasted effort, as there is probably going to be a 2.3.4
release before 2.3.x is EOL. At least, having reliable tests on
Jenkins helps not miss problems with backports to 2.3.x. I seem to
recall something was change in 2.4.x to help this but either didn't
work or didn't apply to
Might be out of topic: regarding SPARK-24211 (flaky tests in
StreamingJoinSuite) I might volunteer to take a look, but if things are not
flaky with branch 2.4 and EOL on branch 2.3 is coming sooner (in some
months), I wonder we still want to tackle it in any way.
2019년 2월 7일 (목) 오후 2:21, Sean
+1 from me. I built and tested the source release on the same env and
this time not seeing failures. Good, no idea what happened.
I updated Fix Version on JIRAs that were marked as 2.3.4 but went in
before the RC2 tag.
I'm kinda concerned that this test keeps failing in branch 2.3:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.3.3.
The vote is open until February 8 6:00PM (PST) and passes if a majority +1
PMC votes are cast, with
a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.3
[ ] -1 Do not release this package
23 matches
Mail list logo