[RESULT] [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

The vote passes. Thanks to all who helped with the release! I'll start publishing everything today, and an announcement will be sent when artifacts have propagated to the mirrors (probably early next week). +1 (* = binding): - Marcelo Vanzin * - Sean Owen * - Felix Cheung * - Tom Graves * +0:

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

day, June 28, 2018 11:12:45 AM > To: Sean Owen > Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) > > Alright, uploaded the missing packages. > > I'll send a PR to update the release scripts just in case... > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Sean Owen

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

If I recall we stop releasing Hadoop 2.3 or 2.4 in newer releases (2.2+?) - that might be why they are not the release script. From: Marcelo Vanzin Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:12:45 AM To: Sean Owen Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Alright, uploaded the missing packages. I'll send a PR to update the release scripts just in case... On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > If it's easy enough to produce them, I agree you can just add them to the RC > dir. > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:56 AM Marcelo Vanzin >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

If it's easy enough to produce them, I agree you can just add them to the RC dir. On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:56 AM Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > I just noticed this RC is missing builds for hadoop 2.3 and 2.4, which > existed in the previous version: >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

I just noticed this RC is missing builds for hadoop 2.3 and 2.4, which existed in the previous version: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/spark/spark-2.1.2/ How important do we think are those? I think I can just build them and publish them to the RC directory without having to create a

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Cc: Felix Cheung; dev > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) > > Yeah, we should be more careful with that in general. Like we state > that "Spark runs on Java 8+"... > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Tom Graves wrote: >> Right we say we support R3.1+ b

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Exactly... From: Marcelo Vanzin Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:16:08 AM To: Tom Graves Cc: Felix Cheung; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) Yeah, we should be more careful with that in general. Like we state that "Spark runs on Java 8+"... O

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Spark-2-1-2-RC2-tt22540.html#a22555 > > Since it isn’t a regression I’d say +1 from me. > > > > From: Tom Graves > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:56:16 AM > To: Marcelo Vanzin

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

wrote: Yes, this is broken with newer version of R. We check explicitly for warning for the R check which should fail the test run. From: Marcelo Vanzin Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM To: Felix Cheung Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)  Not sure I

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

.nabble.com/VOTE-Spark-2-1-2-RC2-tt22540.html#a22555 Since it isn’t a regression I’d say +1 from me. From: Tom Graves Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:56:16 AM To: Marcelo Vanzin; Felix Cheung Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) If this is just supporting

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

: Yes, this is broken with newer version of R. We check explicitly for warning for the R check which should fail the test run. From: Marcelo Vanzin Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM To: Felix Cheung Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) Not sure I

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

lakes: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/user/vanzin/my-views/view/Spark/ (Look for the 2.1 branch jobs.) > > From: Marcelo Vanzin > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:55 PM > To: Felix Cheung > Cc: Marcelo Vanzin; Tom Graves; dev > > Sub

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Argument names in code not in docs: > singular.ok > Mismatches in argument names: > Position: 16 Code: singular.ok Docs: contrasts > Position: 17 Code: contrasts Docs: ... > > ____________ > From: Sean Owen > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 5:02:37 AM >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

mes in code not in docs: > singular.ok > Mismatches in argument names: > Position: 16 Code: singular.ok Docs: contrasts > Position: 17 Code: contrasts Docs: ... > > ____________ > From: Sean Owen > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 5:02:37 AM > To: Marcelo Van

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Code: contrasts Docs: ... From: Sean Owen Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 5:02:37 AM To: Marcelo Vanzin Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2) +1 from me too for the usual reasons. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candi

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

+1 from me too for the usual reasons. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.1.3. > > The vote is open until Fri, June 29th @ 9PM UTC (2PM PDT) and passes if a > majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a

[VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.1.3. The vote is open until Fri, June 29th @ 9PM UTC (2PM PDT) and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.3 [ ] -1 Do not release this

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.3 (RC2)

Starting with my own +1. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.1.3. > > The vote is open until Fri, June 29th @ 9PM UTC (2PM PDT) and passes if a > majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3