:00, Felix Cheung
>> >
>> >> felixcheung_m@
>> >
>> >> 님이 작성:
>> >>>
>> >>>> It’s a great point about min R version. From what I see, mostly
>> because
>> >>>> of fixes and packages support,
?
> >>>> So
> >>>> perhaps 3.4 as min version is reasonable esp. for Spark 3.
> >>>>
> >>>> Are we getting traction with CRAN sysadmin? It seems like this has
> been
> >>>> broken a few times.
> >>>>
s of R are fairly up to date?
>>>> So
>>>> perhaps 3.4 as min version is reasonable esp. for Spark 3.
>>>>
>>>> Are we getting traction with CRAN sysadmin? It seems like this has been
>>>> broken a few times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>&g
t;>> broken a few times.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> *From:* Liang-Chi Hsieh
> viirya@
>
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2018 2:32 AM
>>> *To:*
> dev@.apache
>>> *Subject:* Re: [dis
ion with CRAN sysadmin? It seems like this has been
>> broken a few times.
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Liang-Chi Hsieh
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2018 2:32 AM
>> *To:* dev@spark.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [discuss] S
---
> *From:* Liang-Chi Hsieh
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2018 2:32 AM
> *To:* dev@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [discuss] SparkR CRAN feasibility check server problem
>
>
> Yeah, thanks Hyukjin Kwon for bringing this up for discussion.
>
> I don't know how h
.
From: Liang-Chi Hsieh
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 2:32 AM
To: dev@spark.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] SparkR CRAN feasibility check server problem
Yeah, thanks Hyukjin Kwon for bringing this up for discussion.
I don't know how higher versions of R
Yeah, thanks Hyukjin Kwon for bringing this up for discussion.
I don't know how higher versions of R are widely used across R community. If
R version 3.1.x was not very commonly used, I think we can discuss to
upgrade minimum R version in next Spark version.
If we ended up with not upgrading,
> Can upgrading R able to fix the issue. Is this perhaps not necessarily
malform but some new format for new versions perhaps?
That's my guess. I am not totally sure about it tho.
> Anyway we should consider upgrading R version if that fixes the problem.
Yea, we should. If we should, it should
Thanks for being this up and much appreciate with keeping on top of this at
all times.
Can upgrading R able to fix the issue. Is this perhaps not necessarily
malform but some new format for new versions perhaps? Anyway we should
consider upgrading R version if that fixes the problem.
As an
Hi all,
I want to raise the CRAN failure issue because it started to block Spark
PRs time to time. Since the number
of PRs grows hugely in Spark community, this is critical to not block other
PRs.
There has been a problem at CRAN (See
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20005 for analysis).
To
11 matches
Mail list logo
