MGB
Cc: Michael Allman <mich...@videoamp.com>, dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
Date: 08/07/2016 17:26
Subject: Re: Spark 2.0.0 performance; potential large Spark core
regression
bq. we turned it off when fixing a bug
Adam:
Can you refer to the bug JIRA ?
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 8, 201
e can post the 1.6.2 comparison early next week, running lots of
iterations over the weekend once we get the dedicated time again
Cheers,
From:Michael Allman <mich...@videoamp.com>
To: Adam Roberts/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc:dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
Date:
dedicated time again
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Michael Allman <mich...@videoamp.com
>> <mailto:mich...@videoamp.com>>
>> To:Adam Roberts/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>> Cc:dev <dev@spark.apach
n
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>
> From:Michael Allman <mich...@videoamp.com>
> To:Adam Roberts/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> Cc: dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
> Date:08/07/2016 16:44
> Subject:Re: Spark 2.0.0 performance; pot
MGB
Cc: dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
Date: 08/07/2016 16:44
Subject: Re: Spark 2.0.0 performance; potential large Spark core
regression
Hi Adam,
Do you have your spark confs and your spark-env.sh somewhere where we can
see them? If not, can you make them available?
Cheers,
Micha
Hi Adam,
Do you have your spark confs and your spark-env.sh somewhere where we can see
them? If not, can you make them available?
Cheers,
Michael
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Adam Roberts wrote:
>
> Hi, we've been testing the performance of Spark 2.0 compared to
Hi, we've been testing the performance of Spark 2.0 compared to previous
releases, unfortunately there are no Spark 2.0 compatible versions of
HiBench and SparkPerf apart from those I'm working on (see
https://github.com/databricks/spark-perf/issues/108)
With the Spark 2.0 version of SparkPerf