>> just saying the next release.
>>>>
>>>> In any case I think in the next release it will be great to get more
>>>> Python 3.x release test coverage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
st saying the next release.
>>>
>>> In any case I think in the next release it will be great to get more
>>> Python 3.x release test coverage.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------
>>> *From:* shane knapp
>>>
I think in the next release it will be great to get more
>> Python 3.x release test coverage.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* shane knapp
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 29, 2019 4:46 PM
>> *To:* Bryan Cutler
>> *Cc:* Felix Cheun
3.4 is end of life but 3.5 is not. From your link
>>>
>>> we expect to release Python 3.5.8 around September 2019.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------
>>> *From:* shane knapp
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 7:5
To: Bryan Cutler
Cc: Felix Cheung; Hyukjin Kwon; dev
Subject: Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
i'm not opposed to 3.6 at all.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:16 PM Bryan Cutler
mailto:cutl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
PyArrow dropping Python 3.4 was mainly due to support goin
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* shane knapp
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 7:54 PM
>> *To:* Hyukjin Kwon
>> *Cc:* Bryan Cutler; dev; Felix Cheung
>> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
&g
t; *Cc:* Bryan Cutler; dev; Felix Cheung
> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
>
> looks like the same for 3.5... https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0478/
>
> let's pick a python version and start testing.
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:52
version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
looks like the same for 3.5... https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0478/
let's pick a python version and start testing.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:52 PM shane knapp
mailto:skn...@berkeley.edu>> wrote:
If there was, it looks inevitable to upgrade Jenkins\s
looks like the same for 3.5... https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0478/
let's pick a python version and start testing.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:52 PM shane knapp wrote:
>
>> If there was, it looks inevitable to upgrade Jenkins\s Python from 3.4 to
>> 3.5.
>>
>> this is inevitable. 3.4s
>
>
> If there was, it looks inevitable to upgrade Jenkins\s Python from 3.4 to
> 3.5.
>
> this is inevitable. 3.4s final release was 10 days ago (
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0429/) so we're basically EOL.
t manually without Jenkins coverage.
>
>
> --
> *From:* shane knapp
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:11 PM
> *To:* Bryan Cutler
> *Cc:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
>
> i'm pretty certain th
Jenkins coverage.
From: shane knapp
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:11 PM
To: Bryan Cutler
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
i'm pretty certain that i've got a solid python 3.5 conda environment ready to
be deployed
25, 2019 6:48 PM
>>> *To:* Hyukjin Kwon
>>> *Cc:* dev; Bryan Cutler; Takuya UESHIN; shane knapp
>>> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x
>>> [SPARK-27276]
>>>
>>> I don't know a lot about Arrow here, but seems reason
ch 25, 2019 6:48 PM
>> *To:* Hyukjin Kwon
>> *Cc:* dev; Bryan Cutler; Takuya UESHIN; shane knapp
>> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
>>
>> I don't know a lot about Arrow here, but seems reasonable. Is this for
>> Spark 3.0 or
Hyukjin Kwon
> *Cc:* dev; Bryan Cutler; Takuya UESHIN; shane knapp
> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
>
> I don't know a lot about Arrow here, but seems reasonable. Is this for
> Spark 3.0 or for 2.x? Certainly, requiring the latest for Spark
I’m +1 if 3.0
From: Sean Owen
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:48 PM
To: Hyukjin Kwon
Cc: dev; Bryan Cutler; Takuya UESHIN; shane knapp
Subject: Re: Upgrading minimal PyArrow version to 0.12.x [SPARK-27276]
I don't know a lot about Arrow here, but seems
I don't know a lot about Arrow here, but seems reasonable. Is this for
Spark 3.0 or for 2.x? Certainly, requiring the latest for Spark 3
seems right.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:17 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We really need to upgrade the minimal version soon. It's actually slowing
>
thanks for the heads up... i'll test deploy this tomorrow and see what
gotchas turn up. we may need to upgrade from python 3.4 to 3.5 IIRC.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We really need to upgrade the minimal version soon. It's actually slowing
> down the
Hi all,
We really need to upgrade the minimal version soon. It's actually slowing
down the PySpark dev, for instance, by the overhead that sometimes we need
currently to test all multiple matrix of Arrow and Pandas. Also, it
currently requires to add some weird hacks or ugly codes. Some bugs
19 matches
Mail list logo
