This is all merged to master/2.4. AFAIK there aren't any items I'm
monitoring that are needed for 2.4.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:54 PM Sean Owen wrote:
> Yep, we're going to merge a change to separate the k8s tests into a
> separate profile, and fix up the Scala 2.12 thing. While non-critical
Sean,
Yes, I updated the PR and re-run it.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Yep, we're going to merge a change to separate the k8s tests into a
> separate profile, and fix up the Scala 2.12 thing. While non-critical those
> are pretty nice to have for 2.4. I think that's
I also think we should get this in:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22841
It's to deprecate a confusing & broken window function API, so we can
remove them in 3.0 and redesign a better one. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25841 for more information.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at
Yep, we're going to merge a change to separate the k8s tests into a
separate profile, and fix up the Scala 2.12 thing. While non-critical those
are pretty nice to have for 2.4. I think that's doable within the next 12
hours even.
@skonto I think there's one last minor thing needed on this PR?
Any updates on this topic? https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22827 is
merged and 2.4 is unblocked.
I'll cut RC5 shortly after the weekend, and it will be great to include the
change proposed here.
Thanks,
Wenchen
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:55 AM Stavros Kontopoulos <
>
> I think it's worth getting in a change to just not enable this module,
> which ought to be entirely safe, and avoid two of the issues we
> identified.
>
Besides disabling it, when someone wants to run the tests with 2.12 he
should be able to do so. So propagating the Scala profile still makes
I think it's worth getting in a change to just not enable this module,
which ought to be entirely safe, and avoid two of the issues we
identified.
that said it didn't block RC4 so need not block RC5.
But should happen today if we're doing it.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:47 AM Xiao Li wrote:
>
>
Hopefully, this will not delay RC5. Since this is not a blocker ticket, RC5
will start if all the blocker tickets are resolved.
Thanks,
Xiao
Sean Owen 于2018年10月25日周四 上午8:44写道：
> Yes, I agree, and perhaps you are best placed to do that for 2.4.0 RC5 :)
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM
Yes, I agree, and perhaps you are best placed to do that for 2.4.0 RC5 :)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM Stavros Kontopoulos
wrote:
>
> I agree these tests should be manual for now but should be run somehow before
> a release to make sure things are working right?
>
> For the other issue:
I agree these tests should be manual for now but should be run somehow
before a release to make sure things are working right?
For the other issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25835 .
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Stavros Kontopoulos <
stavros.kontopou...@lightbend.com>
I will open a jira for the profile propagation issue and have a look to fix
it.
Stavros
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Erik Erlandson wrote:
>
> I would be comfortable making the integration testing manual for now. A
> JIRA for ironing out how to make it reliable for automatic as a goal for
I would be comfortable making the integration testing manual for now. A
JIRA for ironing out how to make it reliable for automatic as a goal for
3.0 seems like a good idea.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:11 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> Forking this thread.
>
> Because we'll have another RC, we could
12 matches
Mail list logo
