Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#discussion_r10553691
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -133,11 +148,11 @@ class ClientArguments(val args:
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10553709
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-37502813
@mateiz maybe you could take a pass on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#discussion_r10553724
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -133,11 +148,11 @@ class ClientArguments(val args:
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#discussion_r10553741
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -67,24 +67,39 @@ class ClientArguments(val args:
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37503046
Sandy - looks good to me. Are you still changing things? I noticed there
are a few comments that maybe should be updated:
```
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/113#issuecomment-37503197
@andrewor14 any comments or reservations on this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#discussion_r10554025
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -133,11 +148,11 @@ class ClientArguments(val args:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/112
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37504134
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13150/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37504125
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13152/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37504124
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/79#issuecomment-37504122
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37504133
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37504132
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13151/
---
If your project
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-37505082
BTW as mentioned above please use PriorityQueue here instead of copying
their heap. It's just a lot of work to copy the heap.. we can take the
performance hit instead.
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/128#discussion_r10554415
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -184,13 +184,12 @@
artifactIdmetrics-graphite/artifactId
/dependency
dependency
-
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/130#issuecomment-37505269
Jenkins, add to whitelist and test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-37505304
PriorityQueue in a way is just a wrapper over heapq and allows for blocking
for put and get(AFAIU). We would need maxheapq to retain the top N smallest
elements. One
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37506200
@mengxr nice work! Thanks for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-37506805
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/130#issuecomment-37506800
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-37506962
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-37507039
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13155/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-37507037
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131#issuecomment-37507055
Thanks. I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-37509934
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/130#issuecomment-37509933
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-37509935
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13154/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/124#issuecomment-37510206
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/131
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/124#issuecomment-37514176
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13156/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/124#issuecomment-37514175
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/124#issuecomment-37514378
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/89#discussion_r10559136
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -487,6 +477,88 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
/tr
/table
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/89#discussion_r10559142
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -487,6 +477,88 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
/tr
/table
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/124#issuecomment-37518903
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13157/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37518963
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/134#issuecomment-37518956
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37518962
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37523239
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13158/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37527761
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15#issuecomment-37529958
Thanks for the fix. Only for the record this happens only when
MASTER=local or local[2].
Looks good. It might be good to add above test case in ReplSuite
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15#issuecomment-37530227
Mind changing the PR title to add Jira ID?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16#issuecomment-37531010
It might be good to add this test in java8 API suite ? Not sure if its 100%
necessary, but there exist one for all other APIs (I hope!!). Thoughts ?
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37533206
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37533178
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37540002
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37540073
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/125#issuecomment-37540004
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13160/
---
If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37543156
Looks good to me. I made the small comment about perhaps leaving the
--am-class out of the usage but I'm ok either way.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37547666
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37547667
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13161/
---
If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/89#issuecomment-37554932
@mridulm and @puravaggarwal Thanks for doing this. As a general direction,
however, we are actually moving away from MetadataCleaner in the long run -
PR#126 is the
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/113#issuecomment-37555992
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#discussion_r10576154
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -222,4 +232,19 @@ private[spark] object HadoopRDD {
def
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10576181
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -149,14 +151,9 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTracker(conf: SparkConf)
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#discussion_r10576332
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -222,4 +232,19 @@ private[spark] object HadoopRDD {
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37563131
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37563870
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#discussion_r10576136
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -222,4 +232,19 @@ private[spark] object HadoopRDD {
def
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-37563984
Do you mind closing this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sryza closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37564441
Updated patch with feedback
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10577891
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -17,28 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10578300
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -17,28 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10578363
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37570650
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/101#issuecomment-37570651
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13162/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37570639
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13163/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37570638
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10579167
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -181,15 +178,50 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user berngp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/116#discussion_r10579188
--- Diff: bin/spark-shell ---
@@ -30,69 +30,367 @@ esac
# Enter posix mode for bash
set -o posix
-CORE_PATTERN=^[0-9]+$
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#issuecomment-37570921
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37570930
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37570929
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#discussion_r10579726
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* Return a sampled subset of this
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#discussion_r10580163
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* Return a sampled subset of
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#discussion_r10580151
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* Return a sampled subset of this
Github user dlwh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/117#issuecomment-37572686
I'll release something this weekend.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#discussion_r10580179
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkReplayerBus.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/136
[SPARK-1241] Add sliding to RDD
Sliding is useful for operations like creating n-grams, calculating total
variation, numerical integration, etc. This is similar to
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#discussion_r10580856
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#discussion_r10580942
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -457,6 +457,10 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10581534
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -17,28 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10581648
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -181,15 +178,50 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120#issuecomment-37577269
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/136#issuecomment-37577527
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/120
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#issuecomment-37577534
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10582800
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -181,15 +178,50 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#discussion_r10583451
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -457,6 +457,10 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#discussion_r10584092
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkReplayerBus.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/136#issuecomment-37583751
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/137#issuecomment-37584054
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user nicklan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/137
Bundle tachyon
This should all work as expected with the current version of the tachyon
tarball (0.4.1)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#issuecomment-37584222
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10585234
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -17,28 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r10586047
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -17,28 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/135#issuecomment-37587059
LGTM. Waiting for Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
