Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.0.2. The vote is open until Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if
a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.2
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The
We are happy to announce the availability of Spark 1.6.3! This maintenance
release includes fixes across several areas of Spark and encourage users on
the 1.6.x line to upgrade to 1.6.3.
Head to the project's download page to download the new version:
http://spark.apache.org/downloads.html
To help track and get the verbiage for the Spark community page and welcome
email jump started, here's a working document for us to work with:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N0pKatcM15cqBPqFWCqIy6jdgNzIoacZlYDCjufBh2s/edit#
Hope this will help us collaborate on this stuff a little faster.
Thank you
this should take me at least a few days, and will let you know as soon
as the PR ready.
On 11/8/16 11:44 AM, Tathagata Das wrote:
This may be a good addition. I suggest you read our guidelines on
contributing code to Spark.
This may be a good addition. I suggest you read our guidelines on
contributing code to Spark.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark#ContributingtoSpark-PreparingtoContributeCodeChanges
Its long document but it should have everything for you to figure out how
to
hi everyone
it seems that there is not much who interested in creating a api for
Streaming.
never the less I still really want the api for monitoring.
so i tried to see if i can implement by my own.
after some test,
i believe i can achieve the goal by
1. implement a
Just a couple of random thoughts regarding Stack Overflow...
* If we are thinking about shifting focus towards SO all attempts of
micromanaging should be discarded right in the beginning. Especially
things like meta tags, which are discouraged and "burninated"
It turned out suggested edits (trackable) don't show up for non-owners, so
I've just merged all the edits in place. It should be visible now.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Oops. Let me try figure that out.
>
>
> On Monday, November 7, 2016, Cody
Oops. Let me try figure that out.
On Monday, November 7, 2016, Cody Koeninger wrote:
> Thanks for picking up on this.
>
> Maybe I fail at google docs, but I can't see any edits on the document
> you linked.
>
> Regarding lazy consensus, if the board in general has less of an
Thanks for picking up on this.
Maybe I fail at google docs, but I can't see any edits on the document
you linked.
Regarding lazy consensus, if the board in general has less of an issue
with that, sure. As long as it is clearly announced, lasts at least
72 hours, and has a clear outcome.
The
Thanks Reynold for reviewing the ASF rules.
Albeit the potential issues mentioned, I feel using StackOverflow would be
a improvement. And yes, some guidelines/instructions have the potential to
improve the questions and the "escalation" process.
On 7 November 2016 at 10:48,
My two cents (As a user/consumer)…
I have been following & using Spark in financial services before version 1 and
before it migrated questions from Google Groups to apache mailing lists (which
was a shame ☹ ).
SO:
There has been some momentum lately on SO, but as questions were not
I just looked through the entire thread again tonight - there are a lot of
great ideas being discussed. Thanks Cody for taking the first crack at the
proposal.
I want to first comment on the context. Spark is one of the most innovative
and important projects in (big) data -- overall technical
13 matches
Mail list logo