I like the spirit, but not sure about the exact proposal. Take a look at
k8s':
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:27 PM, Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> (Plus, it helps to track history too. Spark's commit logs are
(Plus, it helps to track history too. Spark's commit logs are growing and
now it's pretty difficult to track the history and see what change
introduced a specific behaviour)
2019년 7월 24일 (수) 오후 12:20, Hyukjin Kwon 님이 작성:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to discuss about some new sections under "##
Hi all,
I would like to discuss about some new sections under "## What changes were
proposed in this pull request?":
### Do the changes affect _any_ user/dev-facing input or output?
(Please answer yes or no. If yes, answer the questions below)
### What was the previous behavior?
(Please
I agree that the long-term solution is much farther away, but I'm not sure
it is a good idea to do this in the optimizer. Maybe we could find a good
way to do it, but the initial complication required before we moved to
push-down to the conversion to physical plan was really bad. Plus, this has
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for summarizing and sending out the meeting notes! Unfortunately, I
missed the last sync, but the topics are really interesting, especially the
stats integration.
The ideal solution I can think of is to refactor the optimizer/planner and
move all the stats-based optimization to
