+1
Thanks,
Cheng Su
From: Holden Karau
Date: Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM
To: DB Tsai
Cc: Dongjoon Hyun , Ryan Blue , dev
, huaxin gao
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source V2
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:07 PM DB Tsai wrote:
+1
DB Tsai |
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:07 PM DB Tsai wrote:
> +1
>
> DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:42 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59
+1
DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:42 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Dongjoon
>>>
>>> On
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM huaxin gao wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Dongjoon
>>
>> On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer
>> wrote:
>> > +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 29,
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> +1
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
> > +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'll start with my
+1
Dongjoon
On 2021/10/29 17:48:59, Russell Spitzer wrote:
> +1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll start with my +1.
> >
> > On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
+1 This is a great idea, (I have no Apache Spark voting points)
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> I'll start with my +1.
>
> On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data
> Source V2.
>
I'll start with my +1.
On 2021/10/29 17:30:03, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source
> V2.
>
> The proposal is to support a new type of join: storage partitioned join which
> covers bucket join support for DataSourceV2
Hi all,
I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Storage Partitioned Join for Data Source V2.
The proposal is to support a new type of join: storage partitioned join which
covers bucket join support for DataSourceV2 but is more general. The goal
is to let Spark leverage distribution properties
Thanks all for your inputs here!
Seems the discussion already settles, I will be the shepherd for the SPIP and
call for a vote on the SPIP moving forward in a new thread.
On 2021/10/28 13:05:53, Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation! It makes sense to always resolve the logical
>
Hi devs,
I'm working on getting Apache Sedona upgraded to work with Spark 3.2, and
ran into a weird issue I wanted to get some feedback on. The PR and current
discussion can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557
To try to sum up in a quick way, this library defines
11 matches
Mail list logo
