> > - Advisory user input (e.g. a way to say after X is done I know I need Y
> > where Y might be a bunch of GPU machines)
You are thinking of something more advanced than the Stage Level
Scheduling? Or perhaps configured differently or prestarting things
you know you will need?
Tom
On Mon,
+1
Tom
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:41 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.4.1.
>
> The vote is open until June 23rd 1AM (PST) and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this
+1. Ran internal test suite.
Tom
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 9:14 PM Yuming Wang wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.3.1.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 21th and passes if a
> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a
+1. ran out internal tests and everything looks good.
Tom Graves
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:20 AM Yuming Wang wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.3.1.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 3th and passes if a
> majority +1
+1 for the concept.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but at a high level this is proposing adding
a new user API (which is language agnostic) and the proposal is to
start with something like the Logical Plan, with the addition of being
able to remotely call this API.
+0 on architecture/design as it's not
+1
Tom Graves
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 9:50 AM Maxim Gekk
wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.3.0.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time June 8th and passes if a majority
> +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ]
+1. Ran through internal tests.
Tom Graves
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:14 PM Maxim Gekk
wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.3.0.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time May 27th and passes if a majority
> +1 PMC votes are cast, with a
Is there going to be an rc2? I thought there were a couple of issue
mentioned in the thread.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:53 AM Maxim Gekk
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Today is the last day for voting. Please, test the RC1 and vote.
>
> Maxim Gekk
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Databricks, Inc.
>
>
>
> On
+1
Tom
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 2:55 PM Holden Karau wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.1.3.
>
> The vote is open until Feb. 18th at 1 PM pacific (9 PM GMT) and passes if a
> majority
> +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 + 1 votes.
>
It was discussed doing all the maintenance lines back at beginning of
December (Dec 6) when we were talking about release 3.2.1.
Tom
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:07 AM Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
> Hi Holden,
>
> Not that I am against releasing 3.1.3 (given the fixes that have already
> gone
+1 (binding).
One minor note since I haven't had time to look at the implementation
details is please make sure resource aware scheduling and the stage
level scheduling still work or any caveats are documented. Feel free
to ping me if questions in these areas.
Tom
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM
+1, ran our internal tests and everything looks good.
Tom
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:10 PM huaxin gao wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.2.1.
>
> The vote is open until Jan. 13th at 12 PM PST (8 PM UTC) and passes if a
> majority
> +1 PMC
+1
Tom Graves
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gengliang Wang wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.2.0.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 11 and passes if a
> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
Hey everyone,
Looking at this again since we cut spark 3.2 branch thinking this
might be something to target for Spark 3.3.
Based on the feedback, I'd like to propose using "Leader" to replace
"Master". If there are objections to this please let me know in the
next few days.
Thanks,
Tom
On
+1
Tom Graves
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:14 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.1.2.
>
> The vote is open until May 27th 1AM (PST) and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1
Does anyone know how the GitHub action permissions are setup?
I see a lot of random failures and want to be able to rerun them, but
I don't seem to have a "rerun" button like some folks do.
Thanks,
Tom
-
To unsubscribe e-mail:
This is directed towards committers/PMC members.
It looks like Jenkins will be down for a while, what is everyone's
thoughts on committing PRs while its down? Do we want to wait for
Jenkins to come back up, manually run things ourselves and commit?
Tom
Resending fixing my typo.
Hi all,
>
> The vote passed with 6 +1's (4 binding) and no -1's.
>
> +1s (* = binding) :
> Bobby Evans*
> Thomas Graves*
> Dongjoon Hyun*
> Felix Cheung*
> Bryan Cutler
> Ryan Blue
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Graves
>
Hi all,
The vote passed with 6 +1's (4 binding) and no -1's.
+1s (* = binding) :
Bobby Evans*
Thomas Graves*
Dongjoon Hyuni*
Felix Cheung*
Bryan Cutler
Ryan Blue
Thanks,
Tom Graves
-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr
>> This is going to be really useful. Thanks for working on it!
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:38 AM Felix Cheung
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Thomas graves
>>> Sent: Wedn
+1, I think having preview release would be great.
Tom
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:55 AM Stavros Kontopoulos <
stavros.kontopou...@lightbend.com> wrote:
> +1 as a contributor and as a user. Given the amount of testing required
> for all the new cool stuff like java 11 support, major
>
Hey everyone,
I'd like to call for a vote on SPARK-27495 SPIP: Support Stage level
resource configuration and scheduling
This is for supporting stage level resource configuration and
scheduling. The basic idea is to allow the user to specify executor
and task resource requirements for each
Hi all,
The vote passed with 9 +1's (4 binding) and 1 +0 and no -1's.
+1s (* = binding) :
Bobby Evans*
Thomas Graves*
DB Tsai*
Felix Cheung*
Bryan Cutler
Kazuaki Ishizaki
Tyson Condie
Dongjoon Hyun
Jason Lowe
+0s:
Xiangrui Meng
Thanks,
Tom Graves
Thanks for replying, I'll extend the vote til May 26th to allow your
and other people feedback who haven't had time to look at it.
Tom
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:43 PM Holden Karau wrote:
>
> I’d like to ask this vote period to be extended, I’m interested but I don’t
> have the cycles to review
It would be nice to get feedback from people who responded on the
other vote thread - Reynold, Matei, Xiangrui, does the new version
look good?
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:22 AM Jason Lowe wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Jason
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM Th
Hi everyone,
I'd like to call for another vote on SPARK-27396 - SPIP: Public APIs
for extended Columnar Processing Support. The proposal is to extend
the support to allow for more columnar processing. We had previous
vote and discussion threads and have updated the SPIP based on the
comments to
+1
Tom
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:50 AM Imran Rashid
wrote:
> There has been discussion on jira & the PR, all generally positive, so I'd
> like to call a vote for this spip.
>
> I'll start with own +1.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:59 AM Imran Rashid wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose adding a
27 matches
Mail list logo
