+1(non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:16 Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:21 AM Kent Yao wrote:
>
>> Hi Spark Dev,
>>
>> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2].
>>
>> The SPIP aims to improve the test
+1(Non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:42 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: An Official Kubernetes Operator for
> Apache Spark.
>
> The proposal is to develop an official Java-based Kubernetes operator
> for Apache Spark to automate the deployment and
+1 non-binding
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 18:40 Ye Zhou wrote:
> Yes, it is not a regression issue. We can fix it after the release.
>
> Thanks
> Ye
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 17:42 Xiao Li wrote:
>
>> Thanks for testing it in your environment!
>>
>>
>
till fix it in 3.4 and the fix will be available in the next
> maintenance releases.
>
> Xiao
>
>
>
> Ye Zhou 于2023年4月11日周二 17:14写道：
>
>> Manually tested the binary in our cluster.
>> Started spark-shell application with some shuffle. Found one issue which
>>
Manually tested the binary in our cluster.
Started spark-shell application with some shuffle. Found one issue which is
related to push based shuffle client side metrics introduced in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36165.
Filed a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43100,
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for proposing this improvement to SHS, it resolves the main
performance issue within SHS.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:15 PM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> +1
>
> Nice to see the chance for driver to reduce resource usage and increase
> stability, especially the fact that the driver
+1 (non-binding).
Run Maven build, tested within our YARN cluster, in client or cluster mode,
with push based shuffle enabled/disalbled, and shuffling a large amount of
data. Applications ran successfully with expected shuffle behavior.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:06 PM sarutak wrote:
> +1
>
> I
