Re: RE: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-09-12 Thread jonathan . schuff
gt; with all those critical bug fixes. > > > Thanks and Regards > Sharan > > > > From: Saisai Shao [mailto:sai.sai.s...@gmail.com] > Sent: 07 September 2018 08:30 > To: 441586683 <441586...@qq.com> > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5) > >

RE: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-09-06 Thread Sharanabasappa G Keriwaddi
586...@qq.com> Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5) Hi, PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other things. Please wait for a bit while. Thanks Saisai zzc <441586...@qq.com<mailto:441586...@qq.com>> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道： Hi Saisai:

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-09-06 Thread Saisai Shao
Hi, PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other things. Please wait for a bit while. Thanks Saisai zzc <441586...@qq.com> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道： > Hi Saisai: > Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? > > > > -- > Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-09-06 Thread zzc
Hi Saisai: Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-29 Thread chenliang613
Hi Any new progress ? will start RC6 soon ? Regards Liang Saisai Shao wrote > There's still another one SPARK-25114. > > I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped. > > Thanks > Saisai > > > > Wenchen Fan > cloud0fan@ > 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道： > >> SPARK-25051 is

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread Saisai Shao
There's still another one SPARK-25114. I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped. Thanks Saisai Wenchen Fan 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道： > SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC? > > SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport. > > On Wed, Aug 15,

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread Wenchen Fan
SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC? SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Sean Owen wrote: > (We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance > release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread Sean Owen
(We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have on 2.3.x in general) On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga wrote: > -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to > be >

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread antonkulaga
-1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to be back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread Marco Gaido
-1, due to SPARK-25051. It is a regression and it is a correctness bug. In 2.3.0/2.3.1 an Analysis exception was thrown, 2.2.* works fine. I cannot reproduce the issue on current master, but I was able using the prepared 2.3.2 release. Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle ore 10:04 Saisai Shao ha

[VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)

2018-08-14 Thread Saisai Shao
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.3.2. The vote is open until August 20 PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... To