think this is something that
>> we
>> want some more community iteration on maybe?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers
>> -list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-Spark-Improvements-
>
gt; package so that people can try to use it. I think this is something that
> we
> want some more community iteration on maybe?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-spark-
> developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-Spark-
> Improvements-fo
in converting that PR to a spark
package so that people can try to use it. I think this is something that we
want some more community iteration on maybe?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-Spark-Improvements-forked-from-Spark
ogress bars, tab completion for
spark configuration properties, easier loading of scala objects via py4j.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-Spark-Improvements-forked-from-Spark-Improvement-Proposals-tp19422p19449.html
Sent from the
lto:ml-node+
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ml-node%2B');>[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=19431=0>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 3:51 AM
> *To:* Mendelson, Assaf
> *Subject:* Re: Python Spark Improvements (forked from Spark Improvement
&g
te.
From: msukmanowsky [via Apache Spark Developers List]
[mailto:ml-node+s1001551n19426...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 3:51 AM
To: Mendelson, Assaf
Subject: Re: Python Spark Improvements (forked from Spark Improvement Proposals)
As very heavy Spark users at Parse.ly, I just wanted to
similar
concepts but incompatible implementations.
We're big fans of PySpark and are happy to provide feedback and contribute
wherever we can.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-Spark-Improvements-forked-from-Spark-Improvement-Propo
