Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Actually, I want to add this for discussion because there were many concerns about the new Kafka 3.1 client. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36517 Revert "[SPARK-36837][BUILD] Upgrade Kafka to 3.1.0" Dongjoon. On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 7:55 AM Holden Karau wrote: > Do we have everything

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Do we have everything we want for RC2 targeted to 3.3.0 for tracking? On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:44 AM Maxim Gekk wrote: > Hi All, > > The vote has failed. I will create RC2 in a couple of days. > > Maxim Gekk > > Software Engineer > > Databricks, Inc. > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:23 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Hi All, The vote has failed. I will create RC2 in a couple of days. Maxim Gekk Software Engineer Databricks, Inc. On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:23 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > I expect to see RC2 too. I guess he just sticks to the standard, leaving > the vote open till the end. > It hasn't got

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

I expect to see RC2 too. I guess he just sticks to the standard, leaving the vote open till the end. It hasn't got enough +1s anyway :-). On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 10:17, Holden Karau wrote: > Technically release don't follow vetos (see > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html ) it's up to

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Technically release don't follow vetos (see https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html ) it's up to the RM if they get the minimum number of binding +1s (although they are encouraged to cancel the release if any serious issues are raised). That being said I'll add my -1 based on the issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

There's a -1 vote here, so I think this RC fails anyway. On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:30 AM Gengliang Wang wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Thanks for the work! > There is a bug fix from Bruce merged on branch-3.3 right after the RC1 is > cut: > SPARK-39093: Dividing interval by integral can result in

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

I'd like to see an RC2 as well. There is kind of a correctness bug fixed after RC1 is cut: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36468 Users may hit this bug much more frequently if they enable ANSI mode. It's not a regression so I'd vote -0. On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 5:24 AM Thomas graves wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Is there going to be an rc2? I thought there were a couple of issue mentioned in the thread. Tom On Tuesday, May 10, 2022, 11:53:36 AM CDT, Maxim Gekk wrote: Hi All, Today is the last day for voting. Please, test the RC1 and vote. Maxim Gekk Software Engineer Databricks, Inc. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Is there going to be an rc2? I thought there were a couple of issue mentioned in the thread. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:53 AM Maxim Gekk wrote: > > Hi All, > > Today is the last day for voting. Please, test the RC1 and vote. > > Maxim Gekk > > Software Engineer > > Databricks, Inc. > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Hi All, Today is the last day for voting. Please, *test* the RC1 and vote. Maxim Gekk Software Engineer Databricks, Inc. On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 10:58 AM beliefer wrote: > > @Maxim Gekk Glad to hear that! > But there is a bug https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36457 > I think we should

Re:[VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

@Maxim Gekk Glad to hear that! But there is a bug https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36457 I think we should merge it into 3.3.0 At 2022-05-05 19:00:27, "Maxim Gekk" wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 3.3.0. The vote is open until

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

I will also try to get a PR out to fix the first test failure that Sean reported. I will have a PR ready by EOD. Regards, Mridul On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:31 AM Gengliang Wang wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Thanks for the work! > There is a bug fix from Bruce merged on branch-3.3 right after the RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Hi Maxim, Thanks for the work! There is a bug fix from Bruce merged on branch-3.3 right after the RC1 is cut: SPARK-39093: Dividing interval by integral can result in codegen compilation error So -1 from me. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Hi Dongjoon, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12350369 > Since RC1 is started, could you move them out from the 3.3.0 milestone? I have removed the 3.3.0 label from Fix version(s). Thank you, Dongjoon. Maxim Gekk Software Engineer Databricks, Inc. On Fri, May 6,

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

Hi, Sean. It's interesting. I didn't see those failures from my side. Hi, Maxim. In the following link, there are 17 in-progress and 6 to-do JIRA issues which look irrelevant to this RC1 vote. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12350369 Since RC1 is started, could you move

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

I looked back at the first one (SPARK-37618), it expects/assumes a 0022 umask to correctly test the behavior. I'm not sure how to get that to not fail or be ignored with a more open umask. On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:56 PM Sean Owen wrote: > I'm seeing test failures; is anyone seeing ones like

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.3.0 (RC1)

I'm seeing test failures; is anyone seeing ones like this? This is Java 8 / Scala 2.12 / Ubuntu 22.04: - SPARK-37618: Sub dirs are group writable when removing from shuffle service enabled *** FAILED *** [OWNER_WRITE, GROUP_READ, GROUP_WRITE, GROUP_EXECUTE, OTHERS_READ, OWNER_READ,