t; > >>>>>> @holden/felix/nick/joseph/maximiliano/saikat/leif: you’re more
> than
> > >>>>>> welcome to give a talk. I can move things around to make room.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @josep
bricks proprietary ML Serving export format which is similar to
> >>>>>> PMML
> >>>>>> but not a standard in any way.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, the Databricks ML Serving Runtime is only available to
> >>>>>> Databricks customers. This seems in conflict wi
I've almost completed a library for speeding up current spark models serving
- https://github.com/Hydrospheredata/fastserving. It depends on spark, but
it provides a way to turn spark logical plan from dataframe sample, that was
passed into pipeline/transformer, into an alternative transformer
e direction of the
> >>>>>> Databricks proprietary ML Serving export format which is similar to
> >>>>>> PMML
> >>>>>> but not a standard in any way.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, th
;> Also, the Databricks ML Serving Runtime is only available to
>>>>>> Databricks customers. This seems in conflict with the community
>>>>>> efforts
>>>>>> described here. Can you comment on behalf of Databricks?
>>>>>>
>
gt;>>
>>>>> *Chris Fregly *Founder @ *PipelineAI* <https://pipeline.ai/> (100,000
>>>>> Users)
>>>>> Organizer @ *Advanced Spark and TensorFlow Meetup*
>>>>> <https://www.meetup.com/Advanced-Spark-and-TensorFlow-Meetup/>
/> (85,000
>>>> Global Members)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *San Francisco - Chicago - Austin -
>>>> Washington DC - London - Dusseldorf *
>>>> *Try our PipelineAI Community Edition with GPUs and TPUs!!
>>>> <http://community.pipeline.ai/>*
>
elineAI Community Edition with GPUs and TPUs!!
>>> <http://community.pipeline.ai/>*
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 30, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Felix Cheung
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Thank you! Let’s meet then
>>>
>&
t;
>> Thank you! Let’s meet then
>>
>> June 6 4pm
>>
>> Moscone West Convention Center
>> 800 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=800+Howard+Street,+San+Francisco,+CA+94103=gmail=g>
>>
>> Ground floor (outside of
ase Joseph, we will use this to kick off the discusssion and
> post notes after and follow up online. As for Seattle, I would be very
> interested to meet in person lateen and discuss ;)
>
>
> _
> From: Saikat Kanjilal
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 11:46 AM
&g
and post
notes after and follow up online. As for Seattle, I would be very interested to
meet in person lateen and discuss ;)
_
From: Saikat Kanjilal mailto:sxk1...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online servi
. As for Seattle, I would be very interested
> to meet in person lateen and discuss ;)
>
>
> _____
> From: Saikat Kanjilal
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 11:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
> To: Maximiliano Felice
> Cc: Felix Cheung , Holden
> From: Saikat Kanjilal
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 11:46 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
> To: Maximiliano Felice
> Cc: Felix Cheung , Holden Karau <
> hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, Joseph Bradley , Leif Walsh
> , dev
>
>
: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
To: Maximiliano Felice
Cc: Felix Cheung , Holden Karau
, Joseph Bradley , Leif Walsh
, dev
Would love to join but am in Seattle, thoughts on how to make this work?
Regards
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2018, at 10:35 AM, Maximiliano Felice
>> wrote:
Bump.
From: Felix Cheung mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 1:05:29 PM
To: Saikat Kanjilal; Maximiliano Felice; Joseph Bradley
Cc: Leif Walsh; Holden Karau; dev
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark mode
9, 2018 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
> To: Felix Cheung
> Cc: Saikat Kanjilal , Maximiliano Felice <
> maximilianofel...@gmail.com>, Joseph Bradley ,
> Leif Walsh , dev
>
>
>
> I'm down for that, we could all go for a walk
You had me at blue bottle!
_
From: Holden Karau
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
To: Felix Cheung
Cc: Saikat Kanjilal , Maximiliano Felice
, Joseph Bradley , Leif
Walsh , dev
I'm down for that, we could
ung
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 26, 2018 1:05:29 PM
> *To:* Saikat Kanjilal; Maximiliano Felice; Joseph Bradley
> *Cc:* Leif Walsh; Holden Karau; dev
>
> *Subject:* Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
>
> Hi! How about we meet the community and discuss on June 6 4pm at (near)
>
Bump.
From: Felix Cheung
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 1:05:29 PM
To: Saikat Kanjilal; Maximiliano Felice; Joseph Bradley
Cc: Leif Walsh; Holden Karau; dev
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
Hi! How about we meet the community and discuss
2018 7:47:07 AM
To: Maximiliano Felice
Cc: Leif Walsh; Felix Cheung; Holden Karau; Joseph Bradley; dev
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
I’m in the same exact boat as Maximiliano and have use cases as well for model
serving and would love to join this discussion.
Sent f
__
From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com<mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca<mailto:hol...@pigscanfly.ca>>, Joseph
Bradley <jos
>
>>> What’s the next step? Would folks be interested in getting together to
>>> discuss/get some feedback?
>>>
>>>
>>> _
>>> From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
&g
>> What’s the next step? Would folks be interested in getting together to
>> discuss/get some feedback?
>>
>>
>> _____
>> From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:10 AM
>> Subject: R
+1 on meeting up!
From: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 2:52:20 PM
To: Joseph Bradley
Cc: Felix Cheung; dev
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
(Oh also the write API has already been extended to take f
.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Huge +1 on this!
>>
>> --
>> *From:* holden.ka...@gmail.com <holden.ka...@gmail.com> on behalf of
>> Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39:26 A
ned models
>>> outside of Spark for online serving.
>>>
>>> What’s the next step? Would folks be interested in getting together to
>>> discuss/get some feedback?
>>>
>>>
>>> _
>>> From: Felix Cheung <
gt; _
> From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
> To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, Joseph Bradley <
> j
be interested in getting together to
discuss/get some feedback?
_
From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, Joseph
Huge +1 on this!
From: holden.ka...@gmail.com <holden.ka...@gmail.com> on behalf of Holden Karau
<hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39:26 AM
To: Joseph Bradley
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: Revisiting Online serving of Spark models?
On
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Joseph Bradley
wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up Holden! I'm a strong supporter of this.
>
> Awesome! I'm glad other folks think something like this belongs in Spark.
> This was one of the original goals for mllib-local: to have local
Thanks for bringing this up Holden! I'm a strong supporter of this.
This was one of the original goals for mllib-local: to have local versions
of MLlib models which could be deployed without the big Spark JARs and
without a SparkContext or SparkSession. There are related commercial
offerings
Hi y'all,
With the renewed interest in ML in Apache Spark now seems like a good a
time as any to revisit the online serving situation in Spark ML. DB &
other's have done some excellent working moving a lot of the necessary
tools into a local linear algebra package that doesn't depend on having a
32 matches
Mail list logo