DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26322.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ted,
are there any plans to move the validWhen-Validator
to core-validator(commons),
AFTER you rolled out validator1.3.1 AND struts1.2.1 ?
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 2:30 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject:
[Moving from off-list]
Thanks, Don.
I took this morning off to get the the Commons Validator 1.1.3 rolled. Of course, as
soon as the updated dependencies hit the street, we can plug those in and roll 1.1.4.
I pinged the Jakarta PMC list about karma for you and Niall, so you should be able to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29443.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20535.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The Commons Validator tickets and docs are up-to-date now. The next couple of days are
busy, but I can try to roll Validator 1.1.3 on Thursday, and then we could roll Struts
1.2.1 on Friday, if we can get the tickets squashed.
-Ted.
Cool, send them on and I will get them applied.
Thanks,
-James
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty
I have some patches
Does Maven completely build all of Struts from CVS?
I just run `maven jar' and `maven war', but I do not
see building of the web app examples or the tiles documentation war.
What gives?
--
Peter Pilgrim
__ _ _ _
/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java
/
niallp 2004/06/08 15:32:18
Modified:xdocsvolunteers.xml
Log:
Add myself to committers
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +4 -0 jakarta-struts/xdocs/volunteers.xml
Index: volunteers.xml
===
RCS
At 10:32 PM + 6/8/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niallp 2004/06/08 15:32:18
Modified:xdocsvolunteers.xml
Log:
Add myself to committers
Whoo-hoo! Welcome Niall, the newest Struts committer. Gee, that
took a long time to get the officialities straightened out.
Now that
Thanks. Partly my fault I've been away for a week.
I had to look up hazing, fortunately seems to be an American practice and
I'm hoping a whole load of Atlantic will protect me from most of what I read
:-)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts
Date: 2004-06-08T16:34:23
Editor: 213.137.125.226
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalog
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalog
Missing link added
Change Log:
--
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
*
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Created a new issue and attached the patch! The patches are in one file.
Let me know if I should change this.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:25 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug
Date: 2004-06-08T16:43:50
Editor: 213.137.125.226
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF
no comment
Change Log:
Date: 2004-06-08T16:47:39
Editor: 213.137.125.226
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF
no comment
Change Log:
I have committ privledge so I am going to apply the patch.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)
Ted,
niallp 2004/06/08 17:25:34
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormBeanConfig.java
Log:
Changes for bug 28668/22207
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +72 -4
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/FormBeanConfig.java
Index: FormBeanConfig.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes, we will need to check this in the morning because I'm not convinced
that closing 22207 will fix the nightly struts-faces issue. I say this
because I was able to get struts-faces to build fine today without the 22207
fixed being applied.
We'll see...
Thanks for taking care of 22207 and
niallp 2004/06/08 17:54:24
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormPropertyConfig.java
Log:
Fix for bug 29284
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +16 -10
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/FormPropertyConfig.java
Index: FormPropertyConfig.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29284.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
What did you just patch then? 1.1 or 1.2? Will 1.2 now use the
(formBeanConfig, ModuleConfig) or (formBeanConfig)?
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:52 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You're right. My bad. I didn't realize that you're patches had changes to
the struts-faces code until I just looked at the commits. The struts-faces
code does indeed compile against struts 1.1.
Ok, now I need to go and double check that the changes I commited to
struts-faces today do not break
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The current source (1.2.x) has now reverted back to the original method
signature:
DynaActionFormClass.createDynaActionFormClass(FormBeanConfig)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
James
I had an email conversation with Joe Germuska and he was of the opinion
that there is no need to make faces compile to 1.1. It should always target
the latest build of struts. The reasoning was that it is not widely used
and is not a production ready piece anyway...so why hinder it with
jholmes 2004/06/08 19:08:10
Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib
JavascriptValidatorTag.java
Log:
Reverted changes made for 29219 so that the nightly build (which compiles against
1.1) will work.
Revision Changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
So what does that mean for using struts-faces?
If struts requires 2.2 and struts-faces needs 2.3?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent
Struts does not require 2.2 it WILL RUN on 2.2. You can run it on 2.3.
-James
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:18 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts
jholmes 2004/06/08 19:28:28
Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/application
ActionListenerImpl.java FacesRequestProcessor.java
FacesTilesRequestProcessor.java
James,
I just read through the Roadmap for Struts. There is mention of support for
faces in 2.x but not before. Because of that it seems to me that you would
always want faces to compile against the latest struts as bringing it up to
date could prove hard if the codebase is already outdated and
I don't disagree that struts-faces should stay up to date with the latest
code. Right now, however, if we do that, the nightly builds for
struts-faces will continue to be broken. That is a bad thing. I think we
need to discuss a more formal strategy for what should happen with
struts-faces.
Well I think they will only fail if the dependency is on struts 1.1. If it
moves to the 1.2 jar it will build won't it?
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:36 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: struts-faces - which
Date: 2004-06-08T20:36:59
Editor: PeterPilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsAndMaven
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAndMaven
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -50,3
Niall,
It appears this is true. However there is a problem with the validator
dependencies for Struts. I got confused earlier about the original problem.
Struts 1.1 uses commons-valiodator 1.1.2 and earlier I think(not really
sure)... around about 1.1.3 there was a public API change (see bug
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:52 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty
James Holmes wrote...
Yes, we will need to check this in the morning
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml
Thanks. Partly my fault I've been away for a week.
I had to look up hazing,
44 matches
Mail list logo
