DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Doh! lolthe first mirror to come up for me was playboy. Not sure if
you saw my desperate plea on the
infrastructure list..too funny!!
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Martin
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release
available for General Availability since Struts 1.1.
You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release
notes listed below. I
Susan Bradeen wrote:
And the biggest _THANK YOU_ to you, James, for leading the team through
the release process home stretch. Congratulations, Struts Team. Drinks all
around! :)
dittos to you guys. (Hopefully soon this lazy bumb typing this message
can try and get involved with actually
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:52:23 -0400, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh! lolthe first mirror to come up for me was playboy. Not sure if
you saw my desperate plea on the
infrastructure list..too funny!!
Oh, you must not know about the if (user has complained about Playboy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-0 (not beeing commiter) on servlet 2.4 as it is not 'enough' available on production
servers
Lot's of the apps I maintain are running under websphere 5 (some of them use websphere
4). I agree JSP2.0 have
interesting features, but can't we wait servlet 2.4 to be avaible on (almost) all
+1 , 2.3
+1, 2.4 - Since we seem to take 18mo between releases,
(that's just the way it is)
we may as well go for 2.4.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 10:09 AM
To: 'Struts Developers List', 'Struts
+1 to move base Servlet API to 2.3
-0 to moving to 2.4
At this point, I think we should be conservative and wait to make 2.4
the minimum until we can explain why we need it. If that happens
during the course of development, then fine, but if many users are
still using Servlet 2.3, then let's
PROJECT
I am trying to build an imaging module for Struts, etc, buttons. What
this does is to use dynamic data on buttons, e.g. color, size, style,
font, language, etc., and to create the buttons on the fly. This is, of
course, done with JSP taglibs.
PROBLEM
My problem is that I extend the
Has the home page's download links been updated yet? They still point
to jakarta's download page which only has the 1.1 release. Congrats
James, Ted, Martin, et al on the release. :)
Don
James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That justification doesn't cut it, for me at least. Based on our past
behaviour, it's very likely that there will be something fairly stable
that people can pick up as a nightly build long, long before the final
release. That will likely still be long
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:56 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
Perhaps we should have a similar justification for 2.3, but I guess
I feel like it's old enough now that just because is an OK reason.
Why 2.3?
(1) It is preferred platform of active Struts developers.
(2) It is needed for certain
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:03:59 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:56 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
Perhaps we should have a similar justification for 2.3, but I guess
I feel like it's old enough now that just because is an OK reason.
Why 2.3?
(1) It is
jmitchell2004/08/31 10:23:10
Modified:doc acquiring.xml announce.xml project.xml
doc/faqs apps.xml
doc/proposals release-plan_1_2_0.xml
Log:
updates for 1.2.2 and fix a bad doc reference for 1_2_0
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jmitchell2004/08/31 11:39:04
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorPlugIn.java
Log:
fix for a method missing in 1.3.1
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +5 -5
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/ValidatorPlugIn.java
Index:
Thanks Jim, Ted, Martin et al to make it happen
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 07:19, James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release
available for General Availability since Struts 1.1.
maybe it'd be a good idea to also post this announcement to the
announcements list at jakarta (since it has a large subscription base).
- robert
On 31 Aug 2004, at 15:19, James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability
of
Struts 1.2.2. This release
sure, go for it.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30972.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jmitchell2004/08/31 13:41:29
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition
ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
Log:
Boolean.valueOf(boolean) is 1.4.x, this fix will work for 1.3.1 forward
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +4 -4
done.
- robert
On 31 Aug 2004, at 21:19, James Mitchell wrote:
sure, go for it.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL
One very good reason to stay with Bugzilla is that we often exchange tickets with
Jakarta Commons.
So, until Jakarta Commons changes to another system, I'm amending my previous +1 to -1.
Should Jakarta Commons ever change, then I would be in favor of migrating with them,
to retain
Hi!
It appaears that there are different versions of the commons-validator in
the new binary and lib.
Is this meant to be ?
---
jakarta-struts-1.2.2.tar.gz/dist/lib/commons-validator.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
---
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.5.3
Created-By: 1.4.2-b28 (Sun
No
- Original Message -
From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the
martinc 2004/08/31 22:22:29
Modified:.build.xml project.xml
Log:
Update the build version to 1.2.3.
Revision ChangesPath
1.137 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
29 matches
Mail list logo
