DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27439.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31034.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here:
[Struts 1.2.x]
* The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2
* We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make critical fixes to 1.2.x
later.
[Struts HEAD]
* For now, Struts HEAD can remain in evolutionary mode, but we will
IMO, FWIW ...
Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/03/2004 07:11:48 AM:
OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here:
[Struts 1.2.x]
* The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2
* We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make
critical fixes to 1.2.x
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31034.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
snip
Either it could be developed with compatibility to existing JDK versions
and
keep everyone happy. or go with JDK 1.5 and my preferernce would be to
go to
JDK 1.5 and use all those favorite-new-features.
In the past we have required the Java version that the Servlet spec
required. Why
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 06:29:59 -0700 (PDT), David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Either it could be developed with compatibility to existing JDK versions
and
keep everyone happy. or go with JDK 1.5 and my preferernce would be to
go to
JDK 1.5 and use all those favorite-new-features.
Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the
wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't
mind.
\Anders
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33
Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the
wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't
mind.
\Anders
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33
niallp 2004/09/03 11:04:53
jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
niallp 2004/09/03 11:06:58
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen
ValidWhenLexer.java ValidWhenParser.g
ValidWhenParser.java
Log:
Fixed ValidWhen Bugs 31025 and 31026 reported by Gisella Saavedra
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31025.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31026.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
niallp 2004/09/03 11:12:26
Modified:.build-tests.xml
Added: src/test/org/apache/struts/validator PojoBean.java
TestValidWhen.java
Log:
Add Test Cases for ValidWhen parser
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +4 -0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24497.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and everyone seemed
happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead and migrate
our CVS repository?
I've recently setup several subversion installations and am willing to
do whatever it takes to get Struts migrated. Let me
I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't
published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook.
From the Maven side, we should try to do these things as part of
tagging and building Struts 1.2.3:
1) update the version number in jakarta-struts/project.xml
2) do
niallp 2004/09/03 13:11:19
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java
Log:
Fix empty Validator results map caused by Bug 26413 patch - reported by Casey Forbes
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +36 -35
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:31:04 -0400, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and everyone seemed
happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead and migrate
our CVS repository?
That's a MME (merely a matter of effort :-) task. I've
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as
the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week
to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion
migration
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Don Brown wrote:
I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as
soon as the infrastructure team is available to assist , giving at
least a week to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made.
+1
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:13:47 -0700, Craig
+1
I am really tired of cvs losing the history of files/directories when you
rename them.
David
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as
the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week
to ensure
Since we're using Maven to generate Release Note info these days (at
least as I understand it), and my Maven config is still messed up, is
someone else available to update the release notes prior to the 6pm
cut-off today? I realise this is rather short notice, to say the least
- the Maven issue
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:35:30 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't
published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook.
From the Maven side, we should try to do these things as part of
tagging and building
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Don Brown wrote:
I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as the
infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week to ensure
all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion migration has
already been created and tested
martinc 2004/09/03 18:17:25
Modified:contrib/struts-el project.xml
Log:
Update the build version to 1.2.3, and the Struts dependency to 1.2.3.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el/project.xml
Index: project.xml
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:11:48 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here:
[Struts 1.2.x]
* The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2
* We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make critical fixes to
1.2.x later.
As I
Date: 2004-09-03T20:29:39
Editor: MartinCooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -38,7
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:05:15 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:35:30 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't
published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook.
From the
Date: 2004-09-03T21:53:34
Editor: MartinCooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -81,7
36 matches
Mail list logo
