svn commit: rev 56030 - struts/trunk/doc/userGuide

2004-10-30 Thread husted
Author: husted Date: Sat Oct 30 01:23:34 2004 New Revision: 56030 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml Log: Document that if a link to a forward is used to switch modules, the path must point to an action. Modified: struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml

svn commit: rev 56033 - struts/trunk/doc/userGuide

2004-10-30 Thread husted
Author: husted Date: Sat Oct 30 02:14:10 2004 New Revision: 56033 Added: struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.4.xml - copied unchanged from rev 56032, struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Removed: struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Log: Moved remotely to

svn commit: rev 56034 - struts/trunk/doc/userGuide

2004-10-30 Thread husted
Author: husted Date: Sat Oct 30 02:38:47 2004 New Revision: 56034 Removed: struts/trunk/doc/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.1.xml Log: Remove notes for 1.2.1, since they are incorporated in the release notes for 1.2.4. As discussed, we can maintain a notes section (or file) for each point build.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31399] - Message resources file in Struts Blank is misplaced

2004-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31399. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: rev 56036 - struts/trunk/doc

2004-10-30 Thread husted
Author: husted Date: Sat Oct 30 03:55:37 2004 New Revision: 56036 Added: struts/trunk/doc/release-checklist.xml Log: Add template for a release checklist. Added: struts/trunk/doc/release-checklist.xml == --- (empty

Re: Release process ambiguities [was ... Adopt]

2004-10-30 Thread Ted Husted
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html I believe the Jakarta guidelines are the sort of thing that the board refers to as the project bylaws, like the ones posted here: * http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html Perhaps we should just rely on the checklist to detail our release process.

Re: ActionErrors / ActionContext

2004-10-30 Thread Joe Germuska
At 4:07 PM -0400 10/29/04, Ted Husted wrote: That's a good point. Start simply by making ActionContext have bean properties for the four objects normally passed into execute? Someone mentioned they were already using an ActionContext in their own apps. Was it you, Joe? Yes, we use this as the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31983] New: - Validator validwhen documentation typo

2004-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31983. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31983] - Validator validwhen documentation typo

2004-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31983. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: ActionErrors / ActionContext

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:58:56 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 4:07 PM -0400 10/29/04, Ted Husted wrote: Perhaps it should be based on the Chain Context, which has implementations for various platforms. I've thought about this, but I've also had reservations about separation

Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]]

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:50:17 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to look at those links in a little more detail... At a glance I'm not sure they fulfill the same goal (although they look to be without a doubt very cool!)... I need to evaluate them more though to be sure.

Synergy between BSF Validation [was:Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting]

2004-10-30 Thread Rob Leland
Craig McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:28:52 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sounds great to me, Don. :) We already have Struts-Faces and Struts-Examples on the trunk. We might as well add Struts-BSF and Struts-Flow to the mix. +1. Struts-BSF and Struts-Flow are

svn commit: rev 56058 - struts/trunk/doc

2004-10-30 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sat Oct 30 11:15:08 2004 New Revision: 56058 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/release-checklist.xml Log: Make the link for the HTTPD guidelines go to the HTTPD guidelines instead of the Jakarta Commons guidelines. ;-) Modified: struts/trunk/doc/release-checklist.xml

Re: Release process ambiguities [was ... Adopt]

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:23:36 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html I believe the Jakarta guidelines are the sort of thing that the board refers to as the project bylaws, like the ones posted here: * http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html

Re: Release process ambiguities [was ... Adopt]

2004-10-30 Thread Eddie Bush
+1 - Nicely done, Ted :-) - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:16 PM Subject: Re: Release process ambiguities [was ... Adopt] On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:23:36 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL

Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]]

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:33:12 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: The app you describe does sound a little more extreme than one might want, but I think it's a great illustration of what can be done with JavaScript on the client. The primary app I work