DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37024.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While Clarity make other decisions regarding infrastructure, it might
be a good idea for one of the key Clarity contacts to setup a
QuickTopic to discuss Patrick's post.
* http://quicktopic.com/
Just the thing for something like this!
In the meantime, I'll start a new thread here, with a
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
1) Complete a statement: we need to come up with a single paragraph
that sums up this effort. It should include the desire to work
together, the desire for clarity in the java web space, and the desire
to move beyond petty differences about implementation choices. In
The Maven build for Struts Flow isn't working after r307274 on 10/8.
In project.xml, the artifactId for the Struts 1.2.7 dependency should be
'struts' instead of 'struts-core'. Then,
$ maven site
...
test:test:
[junit] Running org.apache.struts.flow.ibatis.TestSqlMap
[junit] Tests
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37057.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Does anyone have any opinion on this?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37057
I would like to tackle this problem, but both solutions I can think of
have gotchas. Is it too late for a DTD change in 1.3?
Hubert
I like the second, I suppose, but it does open up a can of worms :/
Don
Hubert Rabago wrote:
Does anyone have any opinion on this?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37057
I would like to tackle this problem, but both solutions I can think of
have gotchas. Is it too late for a
Thanks, I'll look at it tonite.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The Maven build for Struts Flow isn't working after r307274 on 10/8.
In project.xml, the artifactId for the Struts 1.2.7 dependency should be
'struts' instead of 'struts-core'. Then,
$ maven site
...
test:test:
[junit] Running
We'd pretty much have to go with (2), I think.
The reset flag seems all right, especially if you can distingish
between GET and POST, as Micheal was asking. This would jive well with
the new form feature that makes it easy to submit back (or post back)
to the same action.
I would not consider
Yeah, I like the second, too.
Which can of worms are you talking about, though? The DTD change? I
was thinking, since we don't have a release yet, it ain't locked yet.
Right?
Hubert
On 10/12/05, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the second, I suppose, but it does open up a can of
I'm still trying to understand why the distinction is important. :)
Someone help me!
Hubert
On 10/12/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'd pretty much have to go with (2), I think.
The reset flag seems all right, especially if you can distingish
between GET and POST, as Micheal was
No, by can of worms, I'm referring to the adding of configuration data to form
properties ala action mappings. I suppose such additions are inevitable, so it
isn't a big concern.
As for making DTD changes now, I have no problem with it.
Don
Hubert Rabago wrote:
Yeah, I like the second,
At 3:06 PM -0700 10/12/05, Don Brown wrote:
No, by can of worms, I'm referring to the adding of configuration
data to form properties ala action mappings. I suppose such
additions are inevitable, so it isn't a big concern.
FormPropertyConfig extends BaseConfig, which is the nexus of
Moved from: User List, [FORMDEF] Resetting booleans for session-scoped dynaforms
On 10/12/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am telling you that checkbox values should be cleared, you are
telling me that reset() is get called.
On 10/12/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still trying to understand why the distinction is important. :)
Someone help me!
Right now, a lot of Java web applications flit from action to action.
We migth use one action to display the page the first time, and then
submit to another
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:44 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Reset for DynaActionForm
Right now, a lot of Java web applications flit from action to action.
We migth use one action to display the page
Apologies, I'm on my way out. I only wanted to respond to a couple of
items, below:
On 10/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, what I'm saying is Struts doesn't distinguish between the two
(AFAIK). However, you seem to.
I do, but Struts don't. You have said before, that
On 10/12/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still trying to understand why the distinction is important. :)
Someone help me!
Right now, a lot of Java web applications flit from action to action.
We migth use one action to
On 10/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[snip]
No. reset() is supposed to be overriden by an application developer,
it is empty by default. But I cannot override reset() on a dynabean,
can I? I suppose that I cannot, please correct me if I am wrong.
Sure you can.
* Write a
On 10/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an environment like JSF or ASP.NET, the framework makes a clear
distinction between the initial GET and subsequent POSTs. During
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, I'll look at it tonite.
I just looked at it and I think this is another case where we need to
decouple a sub-project from the common build. You're picking up a couple of
dependencies that you don't need (antlr and fileupload) and I'm having
trouble
Hi,
I've used DynaActionForm in websphere portal server while developing
portlets. Strangely, I could not able to display the portlet page even
there was no fault on our application.
When I replaced the DynaActionForm with ActionForm, it worked well. Why
it happened? Cant' I use
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib-from-packages has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib-from-packages has an issue affecting its community
integration.
25 matches
Mail list logo
