Re: [CONF] Confluence Changes in the last 24 hours

2006-10-04 Thread Bob Rullo
unsubscribe On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - This is a daily summary of all recent changes in Confluence. - Updated Spaces:

[tiles2] Problem running mvn package

2006-10-04 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Hi list! Today I have run mvn package and I received the following error: snip [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to configure plugin

JIRA - worked started/stopped

2006-10-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
My preference would be that we don't use the Started/Stopped actions in JIRA - it just creates noise on the mailing list and IMO assigning and issue to yourself should be enough to let other know you're working on it. Niall -

[tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Re-hi list :-) I noticed that GetTag extends InsertTag and it does not add anything, it only sets isErrorIgnored flag to true. So I am thinking on removing one of those. From my POV it should be better to remove InsertTag (or better, remove GetTag then rename InsertTag to GetTag), because

Re: JIRA - worked started/stopped

2006-10-04 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Niall Pemberton ha scritto: My preference would be that we don't use the Started/Stopped actions in JIRA - it just creates noise on the mailing list and IMO assigning and issue to yourself should be enough to let other know you're working on it. Err sorry I thought that it was the

Re: JIRA - worked started/stopped

2006-10-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/4/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Niall Pemberton ha scritto: My preference would be that we don't use the Started/Stopped actions in JIRA - it just creates noise on the mailing list and IMO assigning and issue to yourself should be enough to let other know you're working

Re: [tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On 10/4/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re-hi list :-) I noticed that GetTag extends InsertTag and it does not add anything, it only sets isErrorIgnored flag to true. So I am thinking on removing one of those. From my POV it should be better to remove InsertTag (or better, remove

Re: [tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Martin Cooper ha scritto: It would be good if there was some way we could know which tag most people use with Tiles today, but I doubt that's possible. I think that tiles:insert is the most used, even I wrote some tests (in the test webapp) using tiles:insert and I am used to write only

Re: [tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/4/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/4/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re-hi list :-) I noticed that GetTag extends InsertTag and it does not add anything, it only sets isErrorIgnored flag to true. So I am thinking on removing one of those. From my POV it

Re: [tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/4/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that tiles:insert is the most used, even I wrote some tests (in the test webapp) using tiles:insert and I am used to write only tiles:insert But we are cleaning Tiles from the unnecessary and I like tiles:get more (going against my

Re: [tiles2] GetTag vs. InsertTag

2006-10-04 Thread Greg Reddin
On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/4/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that tiles:insert is the most used, even I wrote some tests (in the test webapp) using tiles:insert and I am used to write only tiles:insert But we are cleaning Tiles from the