Re: [proposal] Tag reorganization

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
Quick update: The dojo separation is looking easier than I thought. I plan to finish it tomorrow, however, it requires the latest xwork so we should probably put it after 2.0.2. It is looking pretty good for plugins that want to create a new struts-dependent tag library and want their tags to

Re: Is there a documented release process for Struts 2?

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
On 12/29/06, mraible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know know of a better example that uses Confluence for its documentation? If you find one let me know, and we'll use it too. :) A lot of ASF projects use Confluence more and more everyday, and developing a fully automatic release procedure

Re: New Struts 2 Plugin Registry

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
:) The first rule of cwiki is don't link to cwiki :) Please refer to the autoexport URL instead . * http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/ All we need now is a Maven plugin that install Struts plugins :) -Ted. On 12/29/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before Struts 2 goes GA, I think it

Re: [proposal] Tag reorganization

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
On 12/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the rule of thumb here should be if you require any additional tag attributes, then the tag should be in its own tag library. If followed fully, this would put our xhtml theme in its own tag library, which if we could ignore backward

Re: Is there a documented release process for Struts 2?

2006-12-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/30/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are quite close. The autoexport plugin automatically maintains the HTML version, and a cron job zips it up. The problematic part is merging the HTML download with the other documentation on the site that is generated from other sources. It's

Re: encoding question

2006-12-30 Thread Musachy Barroso
The method: @Inject(StrutsConstants.STRUTS_I18N_ENCODING) public void setEncoding(String encoding) { this.encoding = encoding; } on FreemarkerManager is never called, that's why it isn't getting the encoding from struts.18n.encoding. I logged WW-1582 to track it. No idea how to

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
[From Tag Reorganization thread] On 12/30/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quick update: The dojo separation is looking easier than I thought. I plan to finish it tomorrow, however, it requires the latest xwork so we should probably put it after 2.0.2. It is looking pretty good for

Re: [proposal] Tag reorganization

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
That would work fine for the jsp tags, but we wouldn't/couldn't use the same prefix for Velocity and Freemarker tags since the prefix isn't user customizable. My quick glance through the tags shows that the Ajax tags are mainly their own tags, and at least as of yet, I haven't found a case

Re: encoding question

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
Hmm...I'm seeing it being called. Are you sure it isn't being called, or perhaps it just isn't using the value correctly? Don Musachy Barroso wrote: The method: @Inject(StrutsConstants.STRUTS_I18N_ENCODING) public void setEncoding(String encoding) { this.encoding = encoding; }

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
The change I made to xwork is a very minor, internal Guice improvement that should have no impact on its GA release. I haven't checked with Rainer lately, but I'd imagine XWork 2.0 could go final very soon. As for branching for 2.1, yeah, we could do that. I was thinking of doing the ajax

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Ian Roughley
Don Brown wrote: The change I made to xwork is a very minor, internal Guice improvement that should have no impact on its GA release. I haven't checked with Rainer lately, but I'd imagine XWork 2.0 could go final very soon. I spoke with him at Javapolis, and I believe everything was ready to

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
On 12/30/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The change I made to xwork is a very minor, internal Guice improvement that should have no impact on its GA release. I haven't checked with Rainer lately, but I'd imagine XWork 2.0 could go final very soon. As for branching for 2.1, yeah, we

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
It is an interesting idea, but the showstoppers for me are: * All the bugs that have been fixed since then * The documentation would be completely wrong as it is for 2.0.2 * XWork trunk might not even work with 2.0.1 I think we are 95% of the way to a GA release and really do think it could be

Re: encoding question

2006-12-30 Thread Musachy Barroso
I set breakpoints, and trying the autocompleter page in showcase, it never stops on the setter method. Setting a breakpoint on createConfiguration, I see that encoding is null. If the encoding is being injected properly, the charset of this page:

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
I'm perfectly willing to backport the bugfixes, and the Struts documentation is bundled with the release. We'd just have to patch the release notes pages with any updates. The XWork trunk does not work with the current release, so we would have to branch XWork too, and increment its head as

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Don Brown
Ted Husted wrote: I'm perfectly willing to backport the bugfixes, and the Struts documentation is bundled with the release. We'd just have to patch the release notes pages with any updates. Unfortunately, I don't believe that is possible, and really, it would be counter-productive. There as

Re: [S2] Struts 2.0.2 status

2006-12-30 Thread Ted Husted
On 12/30/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd feel a lot better if XWork would move to the milestone release that we use, and Tomcat uses, and HTTPD uses, and MySQL uses, to name a few. This hand-over-hand approach, that continually dooms Struts releases to beta status is a frustrating