Brian, thank you very much for this constructive feedback. It can be
confusing to new users to try to nagivate a project that a) hasn't
released a GA quality release and b) is the product of a merger. You
raise very important issues that we need to address. I'll discuss
possible solutions
The wiki's not open to anyone - you need the karma ;-)
But you're right, Musachy. The docs might indeed be geared towards
experienced developers rather than newcomers. I've heard from quite a
few they like the S1 user documentation - maybe we can copy its
structure ? I'm all for it [1].
Cheers,
Having looked at the source of this RewriteTag I see that encoding of the
character to amp; is in XHTML mode only
Doesnt this violate HTML 4.01 specifications? Any thoughts to introtuce a
parameter, for example encodeSeparator true/false
public class RewriteTag extends LinkTag {
//
Phil is right, what I meant with open to anyone, was, open to anyone that
wants to help :).
I think some of the most important things for new users are:
1. Features List
These are on the home page, quite visible, no problem.
2. Getting started
The whole difference between Tutorial and Guides
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to do this for the 1.x line as well. I want to push out a new
1.3.7 with a few tiny patches
Please ask questions like this on the user list.
depends=extends means that you have a validator defined in your
configuration called extends - so to find out what it does you look
at the class configured for that validator. In this case its probably
a small extension I wrote which is not part
Your message did get through to the list. Not sure what additional
light I can shed given what the comment regarding JavaScript already
says.
If you have a need then I'd suggest creating a Jira ticket - although
most peoples attention is focused on Struts 2.x now, so whether you
would find a
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ X ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
cheers,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are all the XWork JavaDocs included in the S2 core API
docs? I'm just wondering if I need to keep a separate
XWork API link (and, I suppose, if the XWork API needs
to be included separately in the releases).
Dave
Because I'm artistically challenged I got help from a friend of mine to get
mockup done, check it out here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/musachy/
that's an idea of what I had in mind.
thanks Vlad!
musachy
On 2/8/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil is right, what I meant with
That is actually a big improvement over the current homepage. +1!!!
-Original Message-
From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:07 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Structs 2 feedback
Because I'm artistically challenged I got help
+1.
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to do this for the 1.x line as
I am OK with branching. Not that I really need it right now, but it
does not hurt, should be helpful. +0 from me.
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be
Sounds like you need AppFuse!
http://appfuse.org/display/APF/Using+Struts+2
Sorry - I couldn't resist. ;-)
Haha! I'm looking into AppFuse 2 for bootstrapping. I'll let you know
how it goes. :)
-bp
PS If I recall correctly, Jay says that we are neighbors now. I'm over
in RedLeaf. We
1. Arrived at the Struts homepage and Struts 2 almost looked dead. No
activity since October and no news or release information. Adding
some news every few weeks will help keep new comers from bailing.
We should probably look at automating the website deployment from
SVN. This would allow
Me likey!
-bp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually a big improvement over the current homepage. +1!!!
-Original Message-
From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:07 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Structs 2 feedback
Does someone have time to add the new committers to the announcements page?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Struts 1.3 has been branched:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505116
Added:
struts/struts1/branches/STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH/
- copied from r505115, struts/struts1/trunk/
Please do 1.3.x maintenance and production support on this branch. I or
somebody else will be updating
Yes, the JavaDocs for both Struts 2 and WebWork 2 are combined in the
release, as they are on the website.
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/apidocs/index.html
-Ted.
On 2/8/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are all the XWork JavaDocs included in the S2 core API
docs? I'm just
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the JavaDocs for both Struts 2 and WebWork 2
are combined in the release, as they are on the
website.
I'd probably vote for removing the separate XWork docs
from the release then (if they're not already; I'm
only up to 2.0.4) to avoid confusion.
On 2/7/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html
which also mentions that On some issues, this vote is only binding if
the voter has tested the action on their own system(s). I would
suggest
On 2/8/07, Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H... This is a tough one, but I would think that a version scheme
change discussion might be in order. It might be fruitless, but I think
that type of versioning is pretty rough. Plus, there are nearly zero
docs anywhere about it, not just
If you mean the extra folder under docs, we could try that for 2.0.6,
but I don't think it's worth patching 2.0.5. I don't know where it's
coming from. It may be an artifact of the merging process.
On 2/8/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know where it's coming from.
Magic docs!
At least it's too many rather than not enough ;)
Dave
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search
OK, after thee days, we have
GA - Binding
+1 Patrick Lightbody
Beta - Binding
+1 Rene Gielen
+1 Alexandru Popescu
+1 Ted Husted
+1 Rainer Hermanns
GA - Non Binding
+1 Matt Raible
+1 Philip Luppens
+1 David H. DeWolf
I've submitted the 2.0.5 release for mirroring, so we can update the
releases
On 2/7/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which also mentions that On some issues, this vote is only binding if
the voter has tested the action on their own system(s). I would
suggest that in terms of a vote on a GA release, this means that the
voter is using the bits in production
26 matches
Mail list logo
