I know someone who might have just that answer… ;-)
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:24 PM, Frans Thamura wrote:
anyone read this?
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=63283
any comment for S2's future and direction.
--
Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
Chief of Advisory
Meruvian.
In development mode, using XML, you can also make real-time production
configuration changes without
needing to restart :-)
/Ian
On 03/15/2011 07:27 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
we find also using old xml is easier thatn @Action/@Result
what happen if we wanna to change the result from velocity
I haven't looked at the code for the jquery plugin yet, but I can offer
some insight into the problems with the dojo integration. At the time
of writing, dojo was the most mature framework out there. The problems
we encountered was with JS programming model that dojo used as well as a
strong
I'll put something up on infoq later today or tomorrow.
dusty wrote:
Strange I haven't seen any coverage of the 2.1.6 release. I even let the
TheServerSide.com know about it a few days ago and they still haven't run
anything. I find that kind of weak sauce, although that mag has been going
Actually, who wants to do a quick email qa with me? I haven't been
following the news group as closely as I should, and I'd like to add
more to the news post than what's on the release notes they're a little
dry). Musachy? Ping me off-list.
dusty wrote:
Strange I haven't seen any coverage of
Unfortunately not this year
Rene Gielen wrote:
Probably the biggest European Java conference, Devoxx (formerly known
as Javapolis) is happening next week in Antwerp, Belgium.
Rainer and me will be attending, and we were wondering if other Struts
fellows will be around...
Regards,
- Rene
To be sure, there *are* some cool things in S2. What I for one don't
see, and I've heard a similar feeling expressed by many as recently as
at The Ajax Experience earlier this month, is a clear, coherent vision
of how S2 lets me develop these so-called Web 2.0 applications better
than any
+1 (non binding) - this has been a problem for a long time and I'm glad
it's been fixed
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The Struts 2 Starter Maven Archetype v2.0.11.2 is available for review.
Staging repository:
I've also been thinking along these lines, starting about a year back
when there was discussions around the convention plug-in. Although it
was motivated more on a clean annotation implementation - as there
seemed to be a good synergy between the JSR-311 annotations and what s2
could leverage
Not that it's a particularly good metric, but I always thought the
adoption rates were very slow. However, I'm always surprised how many
companies are using s2 when I speak to people at conferences. Maybe
no-one wants to admit it publicly :-)
/Ian
James Mitchell wrote:
That's a hard
I'm a little surprised that you can't do this now. Is the problem
because of the order of loading the plugins during bootstrapping or the
way the authors write the plugins, or something else?
/Ian
Paul Benedict wrote:
Since plugins are a collection of classes and they are available to me on
I've actually had to implement this type of feature in multiple
enterprise applications. However, I would say that it's not knowing the
environment, but being able to change configuration elements per
environment that is important (for what I did, and in rails I think this
is the most
I've spoken to quiet a few people that are already using zero-config in
production. I understand that it was always experimental, but it was
also solid and now used. I'd have to agree with Don (even though my
vote is now non-binding) and vote +0 if the existing zero-config
features are
Is this the case, or was the thinking more like:
- app 1
- api 1.0 --{
/ - app 2
Struts ---{
\ - app 4
- api 2.0 --{
-
that they have gone any further than that.
Ian Roughley wrote:
Is this the case, or was the thinking more like:
- app 1
- api 1.0 --{
/ - app 2
Struts ---{
\ - app 4
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
latest, greatest stable version,
I have totally changed my position
MarkMail baby http://struts.markmail.org/
--
Ian Roughley
From Down Around, Inc.
Consulting * Training / Mentoring * Agile Process * Open Source
web: http://www.fdar.com - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Newton wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the entire struts-user mailing list
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true that when we vote +1 on a GA, each voter
is saying that he or she intends to help support the release.
Don Brown wrote:
Could you commit your version as a development branch, rather than to
trunk? I'm using/improving Codebehind right now in some of the new
features both in core and the rest plugin. I'd also like a chance to
fully review the changes before we dump the old.
On 12/6/07, Brian
It's great that Tom is doing this work, and it wasn't my intent to put
down the effort. I guess I was just trying to preempt given some of the
OGNL threads.
/Ian
Tom Schneider wrote:
LOL, I didn't know my efforts were going to cause such a raucous. :)
Ted is correct--I started this on
Ted Husted wrote:
On Nov 4, 2007 10:26 PM, Chris Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 4, 2007 2:58 PM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the problem of so many combinations of plugins, I'm all for the
proliferation of plugins, but do think we need to not ship with two
If it were me, I'd finish the book using struts.xml, and go to work on
a second edition as soon as SmartURLs goes to 1.0 (even if the first
edition isn't done yet). Getting a couple of solid Struts 2.0 books
out there is the best way to drum up marketshare for a Struts 2.1
edition.
Bummer...
Chris Pratt wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007 11:35 AM, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to be a little behind on the thread, but what is the message that
we are providing to user across different EL implements? Is accessing
internationalization text and using custom type converters
I have spend some time thinking about this problem - especially when I
was working on the ajax code - but I can't come up with a good solution
(or maybe its just I haven't thought about it enough).
The problem is the bigger picture, and as I see it, is that you may want
to re-use an entire
+1 - Having to explain the exception or the configuration voodoo is
always difficult.
Don Brown wrote:
With the latest refactorings in XWork that allow plugins to provide
code that load Packages, I'd like to suggest that we make it a key
design feature of Struts 2.1 that Core includes no code
I don't think anyone has suggested getting rid of Themes or
Freemarker, just making them optional for the folks that don't
need/want them. Right now, there's no way to use struts without
Freemarker, without writing your own tag library.
Well - actually no. You can re-write all the theme
don't think that the change would have any impact on themes. The
proposed plugin would have all the same code, it would just be in a
separate JAR, that people could either use (by default), or replace,
or leave out all together.
-Ted.
On 10/5/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
I was hoping to, but it looks like I will miss it.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
I was just wondering who was planning on attending ApacheCon this year.
I know Don has a talk on the 15th, and Mark and I have tutorials
scheduled earlier in the week.
Is anyone else going to drop by this year?
How
Don Brown wrote:
The generally accepted terminology for release numbering is
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. Yes, Struts does things strangely, but that
doesn't change how users expect things to work. Throwing in big
features, and yes, I consider new annotations big features as they
worm their way into
://code.google.com/p/smarturls-s2/wiki/CustomizationViaAnnotations
On 9/10/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one issue that I haven't found a good solution for (and my apologies
if it exists in the smartURLs package - it's on my list of things to
look at) is when an action class
Sounds good to me.
Ted Husted wrote:
So, if everyone is good to go on Struts 2.0.10, I could roll it Sunday
night (9 Sep).
-Ted.
http://husted.com/ted/blog/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Guys -
In the thread Re: Dojo 0.9 final. Time to migrate in S2? I noticed
that Musachy mentioned that the s2.1.x tags were dojo 0.4.2. Is this
the case for the 2.0.x branch as well?
If it is, I was doing some research, and came across the following:*
Dojo* 0.4.3 is now available to
Ted Husted wrote:
I'm not sure that anyone is maintaining them now. I'm not sure that
they all work.
My thinking is that if they are kept at another location where there
is a lower bar to entry, then perhaps we can attract someone to
maintain them.
Or, the other option is that no one
PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed
/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If
so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. from
the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if this is the case.
/Ian
Writing a custom ActionMapper is the way to go - it maps the URL to an
action configuration and back again.
I would write one for the http://mysearchsite.com/XYZ+ABC; pattern, and
then use the Restful2ActionMapper for the
http://myseachsite.com/images/1; pattern. The CompositeActionMapper
Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If
so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. from
the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if this is the case.
/Ian
-
To
the advantage of using Restful2ActionMapper/CompositeActionMapper over
something like the UrlRewriteFilter?
http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
I like the UrlRewriteFilter because it can alter outgoing URLs to be
RESTful-looking as well.
Matt
Ian Roughley wrote:
Writing a custom ActionMapper
Is this the version that IBM is bundling in their products, or was it an
older version?
/Ian
PS - Great meeting you at J1
Dave wrote:
On 8/13/07, Philip Luppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very interesting - did you already have the chance to test the
performance in the wild ?
Yes.
Struts2 can return XML or JSON (via a plug-in). What are the RIAs you
are reviewing, and what integration options do they provide to obtain
back-end data?
/Ian
Gerardo Corro wrote:
Hi,
I need to create a really fancy GUI, so I've been thinking about
integrating struts with a Rich Internet
What do you define as a user should not be allowed to execute such OGNL
code!? There are times that I want to call a static method and use the
results. The problem to me (and as Don pointed out), is that there is
malicious code stored in the database that was entered by users - and is
a type
[X] General Availability (GA)
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/
Maven 2 staging repository:
*
Is it the UnknownHandler that is used by the code behind plugin?
/Ian
Don Brown wrote:
In Struts 2.1 (and XWork 2.1), I'm thinking about reworking how we
process
urls and convert them to actions. Specifically, I want to make it
possible
for the Struts 2 dispatcher filter to potentially
Yeah... one book at the publisher (out in a couple of weeks), and the
time I estimated for the second one was ridiculously low :) So now I am
spending every free minute and reducing my consulting workload to meet
deadlines.
/Ian
Philip Luppens wrote:
Hmm, same here. Too busy with the new
Is the Ajax code all in a module now (2.1.x)? Would this change be
checked into the 2.0.x branch or just the trunk under the Ajax module,
and then some cleanup/removal of existing code in the trunk?
/Ian
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I have this working, but I want to give it a little more time to
Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon
this year?
/Ian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would be up for a collaboration, if there are others that are interested.
/Ian
Mark Menard wrote:
On 4/23/07 1:03 PM, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal
on s2 for ApacheCon this year
Also, in honour of Don and our friends at Atlassian, I'd like to
designate a new official beer for Struts 2 -- you guessed it --
Fosters!
Only an American would suggest Fosters ;-) Let's go for VB or Tooheys
since he'll end up in NSW.
You can bet that I'll be tipping myself a big blue can
Does anyone know why there is a converter field in the DTD for an
action? I checked the XmlConfigurationProvider and it isn't using the
fields data. Was this a hold-over from somewhere, or a new feature that
isn't quiet there yet?
Thanks,
Ian
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Is there a reason that Spring 1.2.8 is declared in the pom generated
from the archetype, instead of letting the struts2-spring-plugin
determine the version?
I was wondering about that myself.
/Ian
-
To
+0 for GA. I have some testing code that looks good, but no production
code that has been converted.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
The Struts 2.0.5 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-205.html
Distribution:
*
Blank application, but for now, it seems like we should strip
it down.
On 1/30/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking through the s2 maven archetypes, and would like to
propose that we don't include resources that are at a package level
(i.e. validation and conversion
, no, don't make the same changes, and, later, I'd like
to change the achetype back.
On 1/31/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to run with this. Did you want me to make the same
deletions to the blank application? After all, since they are not in
the correct directory, the files
+1 beta
Ted Husted wrote:
Since the Struts 2.0.4 build is essentially the 2.0.3 build with Maven
fixes, I thought we might as well start the vote. If after three days
anyone needs more time, or we don't have a quorum, then we can just
leave the vote open for as long as it takes.
Release
Does this infer that the only jar being voted on is the
struts2-core.jar? And if so, does this make sense - especially given
that all the DI options are in plugins.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
As it stands, we are marking a number of features and plugins
experimental, because they have not had
I have been looking through the s2 maven archetypes, and would like to
propose that we don't include resources that are at a package level
(i.e. validation and conversion). The reason being that maven2
currently does not support this feature (see
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-54),
are even on
a mailing list, much less that they will read every post.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Dec 29, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Ian Roughley wrote:
If we go the dojo:select ... / from s:select theme=ajax ... /
route, then it should be a simple global find and replace.
I am surprised
Don Brown wrote:
The change I made to xwork is a very minor, internal Guice improvement
that should have no impact on its GA release. I haven't checked with
Rainer lately, but I'd imagine XWork 2.0 could go final very soon.
I spoke with him at Javapolis, and I believe everything was ready to
to
be outdated by the time we release the app.
- Shekhar
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [proposal] Tag reorganization
I'm torn - I like the fact that we are getting the ajax
Sorry - vacation.
Cameron (no longer active) convinced us to go the dojo route and did all
of the dojo widget coding. I did the webwork integration - and tried my
hand at the dojo code after he became inactive.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
Are we just talking about the Ajax date/time picker?
I think I am missing something here - how will the tags be invoked? It
will need to be a new tld with a new name space, right? Something like
dojo:select ... / rather than s:select theme=ajax ... / - so there
will be a compatibility issue, but all the functionality will be moved
forward.
be a good time to make the change.
/Ian
David H. DeWolf wrote:
That's what I'm imagining too. . .and we're agreeing that this
incompatibility is a pill we have to swallow.
Ian Roughley wrote:
I think I am missing something here - how will the tags be invoked?
It will need to be a new tld
themes and why certain attributes only work in certain
situations.
On the other hand, ripping the ajax tags out would affect backwards
compatibility. Are a lot of users out there using these tags? Could
the migration be simple or would it involve too much effort?
Don
Ian Roughley wrote
to Struts2 for the ajax tags (i.e. new attributes,
new dojo version, new tags).
Don
Ian Roughley wrote:
The wrappers around the beans are there to provide accessors to new
attributes needed by the ajax tags. If we were to extract the tags
into a separate taglib or library, I don't think we would need
Personally, I have only WW2 apps with the ajax theme in production and
there is no intention of upgrading anytime soon. I would also be
surprised if any of the other committers have projects based on the ajax
theme in production.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
On 12/18/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL
The wrappers around the beans are there to provide accessors to new
attributes needed by the ajax tags. If we were to extract the tags into
a separate taglib or library, I don't think we would need the wrappers.
The additionally required attributes would be contained on the new
classes in
Do you have the performance numbers that you can share? I'd really be
interested in them.
Also, since you've considering JSF and performance is the deciding
faactor, do you have the performance information between s1, s2 and JSF?
/Ian
dice wrote:
The custom OGNLValueStack made little
ww:debug / tag should list the stack. Remember that the local vars
(from loops tags) as well as the model will be on the stack first - so
if the variable has the same name you will need to better specify its
location.
/Ian
Mark Menard wrote:
Is there a means of examining the value
/
/form
script ... new dojo.io.FormBind({formNode: dojo.byId(bla)});
/script
What do you think?
musachy
Ian Roughley wrote:
The submit works hand-in-hand with the form in the ajax theme. After
all, you need a button to press to remotely submit a form... I tried
mental telepathy a couple
The submit works hand-in-hand with the form in the ajax theme. After
all, you need a button to press to remotely submit a form... I tried
mental telepathy a couple of times but it just didn't work ;)
/Ian
--
From Down Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design *
We've talked about this a lot, and I'm still not sure what the correct
answer is.
At the moment we have a dojo theme (not going to go into the history
here - check the webwork mailing list if you're interested). Like any
other product it has it's advantages and disadvantages - the same as
0 - Won't have a chance to look at it for another few weeks.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
General
refresh.
what do you guys think?
musachy
Ian Roughley wrote:
Yes
/browse/WW-205) to start
playing with and I have replaced the tabbedpanel implementation
with dojo's implementation, so far I have the static and
dynamic tabs working. I was having so much fun that I didn't
stop to ask if this is what you guys want, although it is
suggested by Ian Roughley
yes - a new theme. The only gotcha's I can think of it that new
attributes may need to be added into the UI components and model objects
to support options for the JS libraries.
By using a yui theme in the ww:head element (used to do the JS script
includes) you can control that only the yui
Do you see plug-in's being used for enhancing the framework features,
for adding modules to web apps or both? I ask this because the list
of possible plug-ins so far see to be framework related. The ordering
that Toby suggested seems to make more sense from a web-app perspective
(as features
I've also used the ! notation extensively, and am disappointed that it
is being removed. I find that the 1-1 mapping from the URL to the
method on an action is simple to follow and easy to understand.
One thing that I have not seen any mention of yet is conflicting
mappings - what happens?
-1 - don't depreciate, leave enabled
Given that there is still a lot to discuss I think we should leave it
enabled.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/25/06, Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I'm all for those (or similar ideas). I think everyone is for
those, or at least one or the
Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/2/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick and I talked about doing that, however, we came up against
several
roadblocks:
1. How would you handle nested packages? For example: /foo/bar/joe?
Do we need to handle nested packages?
In webwork I make use of
Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/3/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is actually a feature that I like in WW/SAF, granted som times is
makes more sense to use it than others, but that is always going to be a
design decision. Can you further explain why you have come to the
conclusion
I wanted to, but unfortunately had other commits during that period.
Good luck and let me know how it goes.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
ApacheCon US has accepted my offer to present a half-day tutorial on
Migrating to Struts 2.
Is anyone else presenting about Struts this year?
-Ted.
I'm kinda short on time at the moment myself.
/Ian
Jason Carreira wrote:
:-) I wasn't the one volunteering...
Putting the tree tag in took a lot of time, and I didn't even document it ;-)
I'd say these can wait.
-
Posted
or the business logic
directly. This avoids adding abstraction layers to the
design/architecture that don't contribute anything useful in the way of
functionality.
/Ian
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been thinking about this a lot lately, and I
I've come across this also, and the way I explained it was that it had
something to do with matching getters and setters to be well formed java
beans. Although I never took the time to look into it further.
/Ian
Bob Lee wrote:
I've run into this problem with OGNL where I want it to invoke
I'd be up for lifting the restriction, but I also don't have access to
the code.
/Ian
Bob Lee wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. What a silly restriction. Anybody up for
removing it? I don't have access to the OGNL source.
Bob
On 6/27/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've come
I have been thinking about this a lot lately, and I would say that GWT
is more likely to replace web frameworks than work with them.
/Ian
--
From Down Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web:
If the goal is to separate the life cycles or to share code, then I am
all for it.
But I don't think the end users perception is going to be any different
by this proposed change. The question is still going to be are we
going to use a JSF or action framework? Struts is not advocating a
? Are we going to make them work with dwr instead of dojo? or just dropping them
rgds
- Original Message
From: Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2006 11:22:26 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
At JavaOne
:617.821.5430
~
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/18/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this
I would assume that we would not upgrade the version.
I don't believe we decided to get rid
/ util, i am not sure how
components could be build around it. Would it be too much efford to build
components around dwr or are we looking on something else. (I have almost
no knowledge about dwr :-P so i might be totally off )
regards.
- Original Message
From: Ian Roughley [EMAIL
Thanks for all the work Frank!
I am definitely going to take a look next week.
/Ian
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
As per the previous discussions, JIRA ticket is created:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1330
This is an addition to SAF2 that will allow incoming XML or JSON
messages
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this
I would assume that we would not upgrade the version.
/Ian
tm jee wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x?
0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list,
Is this really an issue? If users are running WW2.2 with Struts2
everything should be fine, so this case will be only when running WW2.0
or WW1 with Struts2 - correct? And it would only be a problem when
running in the same web application (and thus same class loader).
I'll probably get
Frank -
Thanks again for all the work you've done on this front! Email the code
to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll take a look over it and commit it to the
saf project. If there are some interesting classes, you might want to
add them to the JIRA issuse for discussion
/Ian
Frank W.
I think there is also a XSLT result - I haven't researched it at all,
but another option might be to return XML from the action and then
supply a FO XSLT to turn the results into a PDF.
/Ian
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Hey all... I find myself wanting to drive my company towards using SAF2,
or
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 617.821.5430
Quoting Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/27/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have that very talk that I am doing on the No Fluff Just Stuff - I was
considering submitting it myself.
Hmmm
I had a more generalized one on webwork/saf that I've presented at NFJS,
which was a little too high level. I've done this one at the Maine JUG
and I believe it went down well. I am doing it in Orlando this weekend
for NFJS - so I will let you know.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/27/06, Ian
I have that very talk that I am doing on the No Fluff Just Stuff - I was
considering submitting it myself.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
Anyone thinking of submitting a proposal for ACUS 2006?
* http://www.planetstruts.org/roller/page/news?entry=apacheconus2006_cfp
I'm thinking of trying a
So, you are saying that your preference would be to include no ajax
integration and leave the framework and let users integrate this as
required - either directly in the HTML or by creating custom themes?
/Ian
--
From Down Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design
Brian Dittmer wrote:
Ian Roughley wrote:
So, you are saying that your preference would be to include no ajax
integration and leave the framework and let users integrate this as
required - either directly in the HTML or by creating custom themes?
/Ian
No, I definitely would love to see ajax
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
