Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Ted Husted ha scritto:
Something that could go wrong under CVS is that one file's commit
would fail, the others would succeed, and the repository would be in
an unexpected state.
Thank you, I didn't know this CVS problem (maybe because I am too much
lucky :-) )
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Paul Speed wrote:
Of course, there is a difference between polite discourse and
trolling. I think we all know who the real trolls are and I think the
term has been leveled a little heavy-handed lately. I think the
bottom line is that if someone doesn't use
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On 4/27/06, Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear trolls,
Please go. Or at least try to form your rambling in to some sort of
actionable suggestion. But don't just bitch for the sake of knowing
that people are reading, because...
Dear everyone else,
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
You are of course right about this. But, much like taking the ideas about
inventory control and order processing and such from Dell and starting
your own business is possible, the likelihood that you would get anything
but a small fraction of the attention and
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
[...]
I don't think it is accurate to think that ego doesn't play a part in just
about everything that just about everyone does. We all want to see our
work benefit others. For most of us I believe its because we genuinely
like the feeling we get when someone
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
However, if I were to come up with one now, I would say it is simply to
help ensure that Action1 does not die, and more than that, is allowed to
evolve. I know it isn't going away, I know support isn't being dropped, I
know all that. I also know that Ted has said he
I think filters is the way to do this. Create a filter and then have it
e-mail itself every so often.
-Paul
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/24/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure there is a way, but my exploring and googling isn't turning up
anything. Any JIRA experts out there?
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Fri, March 17, 2006 9:15 am, Ted Husted said:
Anytime anyone says something like I don't want to do this work
unless it's going to be accepted to the distribution, then the first
thing I think is that this person is volunteering for the wrong
reasons, and, if so,
Amen.
At work I'm fond of saying Eclipse is the devil. :) It gives you tons
of power (tons!) and then every now and then sends you on a two hour
hunt to figure why the right jars aren't getting picked up or some weird
auto-format thing that can't be turned off (yet in this version or
I'll mention how we do it in case it sparks inspiration...
We use Jira to manage issues for several software configurations and
packages. Because of our odd agile process, we never really know when
we're going to cut a release (which is sort of similar to you guys but
we're more customer
From the peanut gallery...
How we do this stuff at my day job is that we create versions in Jira
for each of the milestones (which I think is what you guys are talking
about) which lets us use the roadmap feature, etc..
We also create an artificial milestone called Future that we assign
Joe Germuska wrote:
So, I was just about to add support for static access to the current
ActionContext using ThreadLocal, and then I realized that this approach
is more commonly used with classes than with interfaces.
Since ActionContext is an interface, we'd have to do something like this:
Dec 2004 02:03:39 -0500, Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A WeakReference is just a way of holding a reference to an object that
will not keep it from being garbage collected (a very useful thing).
There are also ways that you can track when it has been garbage
collected. Once it has been garbage
I don't think weak referencing is going to help you. As Craig
mentioned, an Object is immutably tied to its Class... which is
immutably tied to its ClassLoader.
If Foo has a reference to Bar and you want to replace Bar's
implementation (BarImpl) at runtime without effecting Foo then you are
I agree with Martin which is why I originally prefixed the subject with
[OT] on my first response.
In the end, fleshed out, your stuff may be of interest. But in the mean
time, there are probably more appropriate places for you to learn about
these parts of Java on your journey to realizing
A WeakReference is just a way of holding a reference to an object that
will not keep it from being garbage collected (a very useful thing).
There are also ways that you can track when it has been garbage
collected. Once it has been garbage collected, it's gone though. All
you have is any
Just a lurker; I'm trying to follow along but I still don't get it.
Dakota Jack wrote:
You can tell me to use create on demand instead, but then I don't
need anything fancier than an IoC framework that lets me reconfigure
on the fly.
And, current IoC approaches provide me other important
From an innocent bystander...
For what it's worth, based on my experience following the Tomcat
developer list, it pretty much works exactly as the HTTPD description
below (a).
To back it up, here's the quote fromt he latest release vote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.3 has been available for about a week
It is kind of nice to have revision information in the javadocs though,
isn't it? I've at least found it useful in my own projects.
-Paul
Martin Cooper wrote:
I would suggest just taking this line out...
--
Martin Cooper
On 16 Oct 2004 16:09:27 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
more sarcasm
Otherwise, why not combine the struts-dev and and struts-user lists? After
all, email filters can eliminate whichever list you don't want to
receive. In fact, we can just have all apache mailing lists go to one
address
/more sarcasm
-Mike
Come
I'd just like to point out that the only valid way to tell if two
objects are the same instance if to use ==. Any other approach will not
work.
Comparing the toString() method results as you do is only really
comparing the hashcodes... which are not unique by a long shot (I never
assume
Bah! Realized after I hit send that you were talking about logging.
Others have already pointed out how to do that one using the System call.
So, nevermind.
-Paul
Paul Speed wrote:
I'd just like to point out that the only valid way to tell if two
objects are the same instance if to use
-
Hiran Chaudhuri
SAG Systemhaus GmbH
Elsenheimer Straße 11
80867 München
Phone +49-89-54 74 21 34
Fax +49-89-54 74 21 99
-Original Message-
From: Paul Speed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2004 17:41
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Proposed Action
Man... this is almost the exact post I've been imagining sending. I
hate to do me toos... but, me too.
-Paul
Deadman, Hal wrote:
Some of your word choices, if not personal attacks, would definitely qualify
as inflammatory considering the importance of the subject matter.
As an example of
Michael McGrady wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote the following on 9/17/2004 2:17 PM:
Any time you allow an end user an opportunity to specify a parameter
for
reflection, you're introducing security concerns.
However, a
25 matches
Mail list logo
