My initial thought was that we wouldn't need the duplicate tiles2
directory (tiles/trunk would suffice). I would think that a simple parent
pom would suffice for tiles and we may not need a parent and a master.
I don't really care either way. . .that was just my first thought. We
can always move
On 1/15/07, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My initial thought was that we wouldn't need the duplicate tiles2
directory (tiles/trunk would suffice). I would think that a simple parent
pom would suffice for tiles and we may not need a parent and a master.
I don't really care either
On 1/15/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/15/07, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My initial thought was that we wouldn't need the duplicate tiles2
directory (tiles/trunk would suffice). I would think that a simple
parent
pom would suffice for tiles and we may not need a
On 1/15/07, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm cool with this plan. Let's move it first. Then we can decide how to
organize it after the fact.
Done. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/trunk
Now we should move to our own mailing lists. :)
--
Wendy
On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SVN repo is now set up, so you should be all set. When you send an
announcement is up to you, but now that everything else is in the Tiles
TLP's hands, I'd say now would be fine.
We still need to move the code over to svn.apache.org/tiles
On 1/14/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SVN repo is now set up, so you should be all set. When you send an
announcement is up to you, but now that everything else is in the Tiles
TLP's hands, I'd say now would be fine.
We
On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about moving
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/ to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/tiles2/trunk ?
Is there a need for the extra tiles2 directory in there? Why not just
...asf/tiles/trunk?
I was
Looks like most of the infrastructure is ready, with the notable exception
of a svn repo. Should we go ahead and make an announcement and move
discussions to the Tiles lists? Or wait till svn is done? The website is
up. What do we need to do to get something up there? I assume the current
Here's the Infra ticket for Tiles:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1083
Greg
On Dec 23, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
The board meeting minutes take a while to be approved and posted, but
Henri mentioned on the incubator list that the Tiles resolution was
approved:
Subject: Re: [tiles2] Tiles TLP next steps
From: David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True. Good point. I'm ok with either, but my preference would be
confluence.
I haven't really used Confluence yet, but I hear great things about it. I'd
like to give it a try.
A couple of other things
Great, thanks for the update!
Those look like good defaults to me. The only thing I question is the
wiki - do we want to stay on cwiki (confluence) instead of moving to
moinmoin?
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The board meeting minutes take a while to be approved and posted, but
Henri mentioned on the
On 12/23/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those look like good defaults to me. The only thing I question is the
wiki - do we want to stay on cwiki (confluence) instead of moving to
moinmoin?
Looks like Tiles currently has pages on both of the Struts wikis. The
original
12 matches
Mail list logo
