On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:43:41 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a really interesting statement. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I've
always thought the whole point of JSF was visual components. Yet the
statement above clearly indicates that JSF goes well beyond that
charter, and
Cooper [EMAIL
PROTECTED] |
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF,
Struts-Scripting[was Re: Proposal: |
|Javascript
I started toying with this today... The first problem I found is that if
you set the value of a form field to an object (i.e.,
theForm.myField.value = myObject;), you DON'T get it serialized as was
indicated originally... You simply get the typical [Object] string. At
least, this is the case
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:00:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:30:22 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless Martin is incorrect about the way JSF handles requests, I'm inclined
to believe (despite the fact JSF will be a part of the next
I hear what you're saying, Craig. However, I still feel that JSF
doesn't buy me much when building highly dynamic apps. Some points to
consider:
* Since one of the goals of such apps is to minimise the number of
full page refreshes, relatively little of the app can be constructed
using tools such
Martin, you make an interesting comment that I think ties into this
discussion (loosely ;) ) that is worth mentioning...
A lot of the tools us architects and developers use these days really
only make sense in cases where you have a separation of activities in
terms of page authors and
, 2004 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF,
Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object
conversions]]])
Martin, you make an interesting comment that I think ties into this
discussion (loosely ;) ) that is worth mentioning...
A lot of the tools
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:30:22 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless Martin is incorrect about the way JSF handles requests, I'm inclined
to believe (despite the fact JSF will be a part of the next specification)
we might want to consider using something else under the covers in our
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:50:17 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to look at those links in a little more detail... At a glance I'm
not sure they fulfill the same goal (although they look to be without a
doubt very cool!)... I need to evaluate them more though to be sure.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:33:12 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
The app you describe does sound a little more extreme than one might
want, but I think it's a great illustration of what can be done with
JavaScript on the client. The primary app I work
That sounds great to me, Don. :)
We already have Struts-Faces and Struts-Examples on the trunk. We might as well add
Struts-BSF and Struts-Flow to the mix.
Struts-BSF and Struts-Flow are not part of the core, so they would be not affected by
a 1.2.x branch.
-Ted.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:59:18
Argh, posted to the wrong list!
Well, in all honesty, this isn't something that was initiated by me,
I've never had a thought of passing objects back and forth, so I'm not
sure I can give you a real, concrete use case that would explain it. I
certainly hear what your saying about XML. I
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:52:49 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh, posted to the wrong list!
Well, in all honesty, this isn't something that was initiated by me,
I've never had a thought of passing objects back and forth, so I'm not
sure I can give you a real, concrete use
I'm personally fond of vcXMLRPC - http://www.vcdn.org/Public/XMLRPC/ -
and have used it successfully in several projects, an ASP application
and a Struts-based application. I've heard of others, but that one
has been good to me as it works with IE 5.5+ and Mozilla 1.0+.
This also seems to be a
I need to look at those links in a little more detail... At a glance I'm
not sure they fulfill the same goal (although they look to be without a
doubt very cool!)... I need to evaluate them more though to be sure.
I agree 100% with your comment about remote scripting... I think there
was a big
15 matches
Mail list logo
