Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-24 Thread Ted Husted
OK, Struts 2.0.0 is tagged and posted, and Struts 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT is open for business. :) As to 2.0.1, the XWork snapshot has been updated again, so be sure to delete the .m2 folder and then update and rebuild your working copy As to the running the release process generally, I started a

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-24 Thread Paul Benedict
Is the champagne bundled in this version? There must be a celebratory drink somewhere! :) Ted Husted wrote: OK, Struts 2.0.0 is tagged and posted, and Struts 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT is open for business. :) As to 2.0.1, the XWork snapshot has been updated again, so be sure to delete the .m2 folder

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/24/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, Struts 2.0.0 is tagged and posted, and Struts 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT is open for business. :) Congrats! :) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-22 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/18/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If someone wants to tag r447072 and deploy the Maven artifcats, that would be fine with me. The distributions uploaded to builds/struts were run as version 2.0.0, and we would just need to rename the files. Otherwise, I'll try again on Sunday

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-22 Thread Ted Husted
Thanks, Wendy, that would be great. On 9/22/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If someone wants to tag r447072 and deploy the Maven artifcats, that would be fine with me. The distributions uploaded to builds/struts were run as version

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-19 Thread Ted Husted
On 9/18/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The code is looking good, so thanks to everyone who is helping push this out. The code does look good, in fact, every part of the distribution looks great. The last mile of the assembling the distribution is grisy, because we are doing some odd

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-18 Thread Don Brown
I vote for tagging it now, despite these lingering issues. We need something, anything, and will have plenty of time to smooth the release out. The code is looking good, so thanks to everyone who is helping push this out. Don Ted Husted wrote: I've updated the Struts 2.0.0 snapshot

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-18 Thread Ted Husted
It's not about the lingering issues, it's about signing the release and deploying the Maven artifacts, and all that. I've never actually done that part of it myself. By the time I got all the the Javadoc and wikidoc stuff sorted out yesterday, I just ran out of steam :( If someone wants to tag

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-17 Thread Ted Husted
I've updated the Struts 2.0.0 snapshot distribution based on revision r447072 (thanks Toby!). I would have tagged it, but I still don't understand everything that's involved in signing and deploying the distribution once it is tagged, and I didn't have time to review it all again today. As it

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-10 Thread Ted Husted
I started to roll 2.0.0 friday night, but found some straggler snippet references that should be fixed. I think I've found all of these now, but I'm out of time for today. I'll try again tomorrow. A couple pointed to tag JavaDocs. I'm guessing we need to checkin new tag Javadocs to /docs/tags as

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-05 Thread Ted Husted
Sunday was hijacked by family activities (first things first!), but in the meantime, I've finally patched together an updated tutorial. * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Bootstrap Taking Don's queue, I left out extending the framework, since topics like those are very well covered

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/5/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If no one is in the middle of anything, I'll try to take another pass at a Struts 2.0.0 tag tomorrow night, and then target 2.0.1 for 18 Sep (a Monday). Ted, do you mind if I run through and fix the svn properties? I think there are some files

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-05 Thread Ted Husted
Not in the least. On 9/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ted, do you mind if I run through and fix the svn properties? I think there are some files missing the eol-style native property, and that can make it hard for people to produce good patches.

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-01 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/31/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there are no objections, I'd like tag and roll a Struts 2.0.0 build tonight, including a snapshot of the documentation in HTML format. This would only be a test-build, but the tag will give us a reference point for early adopters. Last night,

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-09-01 Thread Don Brown
+1 Ted Husted wrote: On 8/31/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there are no objections, I'd like tag and roll a Struts 2.0.0 build tonight, including a snapshot of the documentation in HTML format. This would only be a test-build, but the tag will give us a reference point for early

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-31 Thread Ted Husted
If there are no objections, I'd like tag and roll a Struts 2.0.0 build tonight, including a snapshot of the documentation in HTML format. This would only be a test-build, but the tag will give us a reference point for early adopters. -Ted.

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-31 Thread Don Brown
+1 Roll 'em! Don Ted Husted wrote: If there are no objections, I'd like tag and roll a Struts 2.0.0 build tonight, including a snapshot of the documentation in HTML format. This would only be a test-build, but the tag will give us a reference point for early adopters. -Ted.

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-31 Thread Matt Raible
I know my vote doesn't count, but it'd be pretty cool to get the customized-template-dojo issues resolved as part of this release. That way there can be a non-Apache sample app that works with Struts 2.0.0. ;-) https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1425 Matt On 8/31/06, Don Brown [EMAIL

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-31 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/31/06, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know my vote doesn't count, but it'd be pretty cool to get the customized-template-dojo issues resolved as part of this release. That way there can be a non-Apache sample app that works with Struts 2.0.0. ;-)

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Ted Husted
Actually, re-reading WW-1392 * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392 the problem may be XDoclet and Java 5. * http://swik.net/xdoclet/XDoclet/Tip:XDoclet+1.2.3+does+not+work+with+Java+5.0/k0w In any event, Rene pinged me to say that he can try a simple Ant-based solution. Maybe

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Don Brown
Yeah, I tried all that a few months ago, and reached the same conclusion. Either we have to use one of the javadoc processors that support java 5 or screw it altogether. As for Ant, if you can do it in ant, then just use the antrun plugin to run that. Don Ted Husted wrote: Actually,

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Rainer Hermanns
I have a patched version of xdoclet around, that supports java 5 features... I do not remember where I actually found it on the net, but I could send it to one of you... hth, Rainer Yeah, I tried all that a few months ago, and reached the same conclusion. Either we have to use one of the

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Matt Raible
If you build XDoclet from CVS, Java 5 is supported. I use an XDoclet snapshot in AppFuse that supports Java 5. Matt On 8/28/06, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a patched version of xdoclet around, that supports java 5 features... I do not remember where I actually found it on

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Just found it... http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XJD-41 Should be in xdoclet's trunk/HEAD... I have a patched version of xdoclet around, that supports java 5 features... I do not remember where I actually found it on the net, but I could send it to one of you...

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Molitor
For Xdoclet just make sure you are using release 1.2.3 and download the 1.5-snapshot050611 version of xjavadoc. (All are on the files section of their SF.net page) http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=31602 Cheers, Eric On 8/28/06, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-25 Thread Ted Husted
OK, I've parred down the TODO list for 2.0.0 * https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa The biggest stumbling block is the taglib documentation. I experimented with the maven-taglib plugin, but I just don't think it is going to work for us (or at least me). The plugin would

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/25/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The simplest thing might be to setup a very simple Ant build file that just called XDoclet to create the TLD. Then everything else falls into place. If we need to call it as a separate process for now, then so be it. I expect that eventually

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-08-25 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we can do it with Ant, we should be able to do it as part of the Maven build, using maven-antrun-plugin. So if someone can come up with that simple Ant build file, I'll try to integrate it in the Maven build. Shouldn't we be able to find it

Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-07-19 Thread Ted Husted
Given some of the recent leaps forward, it looks to me like we should be ready to start rolling 2.0.0-SNAPSHOTS this Sunday. There are still t's to cross and i's to dot, but this seems like a good time to tap the keg. My personal short list is to * Integrate an export of the Struts 2 wiki into

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-07-19 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/19/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given some of the recent leaps forward, it looks to me like we should be ready to start rolling 2.0.0-SNAPSHOTS this Sunday. There are still t's to cross and i's to dot, but this seems like a good time to tap the keg. Last night Don modified the

Re: Struts 2.0.0 - STATUS

2006-07-19 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Would it be helpful if we set up a maven2.opensymphony.com which hosted the xwork snapshots? - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=37887messageID=74502#74502