Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the
subject matter?
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
continue to support the struts-faces project? If so, can someone
please fix the faces
On 4/14/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the
subject matter?
It is a convention, not a rule. And it is more for the user list than the
dev list -- people subscribed here are presumed to have a clue :-).
Craig
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
continue to support the struts-faces project?
We should. There will be people who want to have a few JSF components on a
few pages (or they want to migrate) -- and using this
Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working
changes in the struts-scripting webapp.
The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was:
javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type
org.apache.struts.faces.Html
I was under the assumption that
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working
changes in the struts-scripting webapp.
The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was:
javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type
Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to
continue to support the struts-faces project? If so, can someone
please fix the faces example (1 and 2) apps?
--
James Mitchell
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
