Then I misunderstood. My apologies.
-Original Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:43 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
I'm not understanding your objection. I was suggesting that
Struts need
Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:46 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
Ok, good, then there is nothing obvious I'm missing. I think
it would be
a good goal for Struts to use validator
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Validator Design Questions
What does currently constituted mean?
David
--- Edgar P Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I for one would never use struts validator as it is currently
constituted
and to be required to use it would cause me to drop
List
Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
This is precisely my motivation: get Struts out of validation
directly,
making it easier to re-use commons-validator deeper in the business
layer. Struts should be able to utilize validations, but only as a
supplement to business logic
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
Ok, good, then there is nothing obvious I'm missing. I think
it would be
a good goal for Struts to use validator completely and not
require its
own validators, and I will look into that. As for the loading of
validators
plus 1
-Original Message-
From: Edgar P Dollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 2:28 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Validator Design Questions
I for one would never use struts validator as it is currently constituted
and to be required to use it would
using struts. Please
rethink this idea.
Thanks
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:46 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
Ok, good, then there is nothing obvious I'm missing. I think
it would
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the validator as a constant source of hangups, I'm working on
becoming more familiar with how it works. I have some questions,
perhaps rather basic and obvious:
Why does Struts perform all its validation with o.a.s.v.CheckFields? It
seems
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 3:16 PM -0400 5/20/04, Don Brown wrote:
With the validator as a constant source of hangups, I'm working on
becoming more familiar with how it works. I have some questions,
perhaps rather basic and obvious:
Why does Struts perform all its
Ok, good, then there is nothing obvious I'm missing. I think it would be
a good goal for Struts to use validator completely and not require its
own validators, and I will look into that. As for the loading of
validators, yes, I'll take that over to commons-dev.
Don
David Graham wrote:
--- Don
With the validator as a constant source of hangups, I'm working on
becoming more familiar with how it works. I have some questions,
perhaps rather basic and obvious:
Why does Struts perform all its validation with o.a.s.v.CheckFields? It
seems it duplicates a most of commons-validator's,
At 3:16 PM -0400 5/20/04, Don Brown wrote:
With the validator as a constant source of hangups, I'm working on
becoming more familiar with how it works. I have some questions,
perhaps rather basic and obvious:
Why does Struts perform all its validation with o.a.s.v.CheckFields?
It seems it
12 matches
Mail list logo
