Author: husted
Date: Tue Oct 19 01:25:05 2004
New Revision: 55055
Modified:
struts/trunk/STATUS.txt
Log:
Update to include this quarter's board report.
Modified: struts/trunk/STATUS.txt
==
--- struts/trunk/STATUS.txt
A release requires a vote, whereas a build does not. Also,
referring to a test build as alpha is prejudging the quality of the
build; it could be better than that, or it could be worse, and
IMNSHO it reflects badly on us if we first claim it's alpha and
later are seen to change our minds
Touche, Martin! A point well made!
I believe I understand better now. Thanks :-)
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt HTTP Release Guidelines (was Re:
Also, referring to a test build as alpha is prejudging the quality
of the build; it
could be better than that, or it could be worse, and IMNSHO it
reflects badly on us if we first claim it's alpha and later are seen
to change our minds about that, whichever way the change goes.
This is something
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi everybody,
The LabelValueBean is a good convenience class.
Currently, this class can NOT translate its label, so we cant use the message
tag in a JSP.
However, I think that its an important convenience issue.
Thus, I propose to you to have also a LabelKeyValueBean class which would allow
to
Semantics and terms aside, there is a key difference between the
approaches being discussed:
(a) In the HTTPD way, the release manager can post
a release (prejudged to be alpha quality) with a formal
version number, with no vote from the rest of the PMC.
(b) In the Tomcat way, the
Vicky, please post this to the struts-user list -- it's the proper place
for this kind of question (the dev is list is for people developing
Struts itself).
You'll reach a much broader audience ... also most Struts developers
monitor the user list as well.
-Bill Siggelkow
Vicky wrote:
Hello
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:32:30 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
Again, here's my +1 for adopting the HTTPD release protocol, with
the one modification of using the term Alpha build in lieu of
Alpha release.
Or, we could even go the whole nine yards and use use Test Build in lieu of Alpha
Release, so
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31788.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I did this a long time ago, and, I suspect, others must have too. I
assumed that the lack of this meant everyone had sort of done it already
for themselves. You might want to use what has been created already.
Michael McGrady
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
The LabelValueBean is a good
I am proposing that the Struts HTML tag library be extended slightly to accept any
non-standard attributes. Searching on the new groups, I have been hearing that
developers are very strict on supporting a proprietary single-vendor lock-in. What I
am proposing is a generic work around for this
Actually, I think what everyone's getting at is that you should evaluate
and then label. Labeling right off the bat makes it look like the system
is arbitrary - even if it is well defined that we start at alpha then move
up. It would certainly look worse to downgrade than upgrade our rating,
I strongly disagree that Struts should support any non-standard tags or
attributes. I don't use IE and I despise websites that use IE specific
tags so I can't use the site/app. properly. We've always done our best
with Struts to produce valid markup according to the HTML and XHTML
standards.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31790.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: germuska
Date: Tue Oct 19 17:15:27 2004
New Revision: 55110
Modified:
struts/trunk/contrib/struts-chain/src/conf/chain-config.xml
Log:
add documentation to base chain-config to help Tiles users
Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-chain/src/conf/chain-config.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31788.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:00:42 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Semantics and terms aside, there is a key difference between the
approaches being discussed:
(a) In the HTTPD way, the release manager can post
a release (prejudged to be alpha quality) with a formal
version
For a very long time now, we have had a strict policy of not including
anything that is not part of the HTML 4.01 spec or XHTML spec. I am
still very much in favour of that policy, and am actively
disinterested in seeing non-conforming additions to Struts.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004
Terminology isn't the important part to me -- voting is. That's
why I prefer approach (b).
I believe assigning a milestone number to a distribution and tagging the repository
with that number promotes voting. The vote can be on a precise entity: what is tagged
in the repository for the given
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat scheme and move on?
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:02:35 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terminology isn't the
From an innocent bystander...
For what it's worth, based on my experience following the Tomcat
developer list, it pretty much works exactly as the HTTPD description
below (a).
To back it up, here's the quote fromt he latest release vote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.3 has been available for about a week
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model,
and that is still the model I would like to see us follow,
terminology and all.
I believe the initial
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:51 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat scheme and move on?
I've seen some casual descriptions of the Tomcat scheme,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:31:45 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:51 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model,
and that is still the model I
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:39:44 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
release Struts, the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:38:15 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(BTW, I'm more than a little surprised at the amount of energy you're
putting into this, Ted, given that you've told us all you're going
Emeritus anyway, so that those of us remaining will be the folks
rolling the
31 matches
Mail list logo
