svn commit: rev 51792 - struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals

Author: sraeburn Date: Fri Oct 1 23:22:05 2004 New Revision: 51792 Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml Log: Testing SVN commit Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml == ---

svn commit: rev 51793 - struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals

Author: sraeburn Date: Fri Oct 1 23:31:37 2004 New Revision: 51793 Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml Log: Test commit from Eclipse Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml == ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18169] - Resource attribute of msg tag in the validation.xml doesn't work as anticipated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: svn commit: rev 51787 - struts/trunk/conf/share

So, what's up with key word expansion? My change to that file, was to add a space, remove it, then save it. On commit I see that $Date$ was changed, and locally it was expanded correctly, but 'Header' and 'Revision' were not. Is there some svn configuration change we are missing or do we need

svn commit: rev 51799 - struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals

Author: germuska Date: Sat Oct 2 06:24:29 2004 New Revision: 51799 Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml Log: correct typo; test svn commits Modified: struts/trunk/xdocs/proposals/workflow.xml == ---

Struts + Maven + SVN

repository connectionscm|svn|http|//svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk/connection developerConnectionscm|svn|https|//my-site.org/ repos/asf/struts/trunk/developerConnection urlhttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk/url /repository You must also add this property

Re: Struts + Maven + SVN

Thank you, that is exactly what I was missing. I just committed the change. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: rev 51803 - struts/trunk

Author: jmitchell Date: Sat Oct 2 08:20:57 2004 New Revision: 51803 Modified: struts/trunk/project.properties struts/trunk/project.xml Log: Fix for maven build since conversion to svn - Thank you Arnaud Modified: struts/trunk/project.properties

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogLazyList

Date: 2004-10-02T10:29:22 Editor: HubertRabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogLazyList URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogLazyList Introduce the nested tags alternative. Change Log:

SVN keywords (was Re: svn commit: rev 51787 - struts/trunk/conf/share)

It looks like we'll need to change the keywords, since SVN uses a different set. ;-( The SVN keywords are documented here: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch07s02.html#svn-ch-7-sect-2.3.4 I would suggest that we drop all of what we are using now (Header, Revision and Date) and simply use

Re: SVN keywords (was Re: svn commit: rev 51787 - struts/trunk/conf/share)

I'm +1 for $Id$. Craig On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:21:59 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like we'll need to change the keywords, since SVN uses a different set. ;-( The SVN keywords are documented here:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogLazyList

Date: 2004-10-02T11:41:05 Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogLazyList URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogLazyList no comment Change Log:

svn commit: rev 51809 - struts/trunk/doc/faqs

Author: martinc Date: Sat Oct 2 11:54:43 2004 New Revision: 51809 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/faqs/newbie.xml Log: Convert a tab to spaces. The Gump buid was failing, even when mine was not, and this is the only thing I could see at the location flagged that was different from anything else.

Re: SVN keywords (was Re: svn commit: rev 51787 - struts/trunk/conf/share)

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:21:59 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest that we drop all of what we are using now (Header, Revision and Date) and simply use Id, which is a compressed combination of the other keywords. As fas as I can tell, it's essentially the same as Id on

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] New: - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31468] - Wrong code in struts-blank example with struts1.2.4

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31468. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31399] - blank struts webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31399. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: rev 51823 - struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen

Author: niallp Date: Sat Oct 2 22:42:01 2004 New Revision: 51823 Modified: struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen/ValidWhenParser.g struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen/ValidWhenParser.java Log: Bug 31514 Do numeric compare when both items

svn commit: rev 51824 - struts/trunk/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator

Author: niallp Date: Sat Oct 2 22:49:55 2004 New Revision: 51824 Modified: struts/trunk/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator/TestValidWhen.java Log: Add validwhen test to compare two Strings containing numbers Modified: struts/trunk/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator/TestValidWhen.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.