--- Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If I sound a little irked about this, it's because I am ... it turns
out that the generted JavaScript function names for Commons Validator
1.1.3 (included with Struts 1.2.x) are different than the generated
names in the version of
Hola Amigos!
AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to introduce something
to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just lie to validator about the name by telling
it the ID instead of the name? Would the resulting syntax emitted by validator still
be ok?
Perhaps we should
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:57:20 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola Amigos!
AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to introduce
something to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just lie to validator about the name
by telling it the ID instead of the name? Would
First off, you don't sound irked, but it sounds as though you're well within
your right to be!
remainder in-line ...
- Original Message -
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: XHTML Form
