Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

Hi, * Troy Sankey [2015-01-29 04:12]: > On 2015-01-28 14:44:52 -0500, Nico Golde wrote: > > What I think may be better would be to only set nick after a successful > > NICK > > message was received from the network as Truls suggests. > > Would you mind testing the attached

Re: [dev] paste@

Greetings. On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100 Matthew of Boswell wrote: > On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:26:28 +0100 > Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > > I consider e‐mail to be more suckless than the web, that’s why I’d > > pro‐ pose a mail solution. >

Re: [dev] paste@

My response is a bit long, but I think the idea deserves some good discussion. On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > I don't think that I'd want pastebin to email me with everyone's > > paste; my hard drive would fill up so fast I'd have to quit email.

[dev] Re: paste@

El Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100, Christoph Lohmann escribió: > Two different views on how to communicate clash here: > > 1.) The web view is to have some URI and it's always available. > 2.) The mail view of having your private mailbox you take care of. > > 3) Have a distributed or