Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

Hi, * Troy Sankey [2015-01-29 04:12]: > On 2015-01-28 14:44:52 -0500, Nico Golde wrote: > > What I think may be better would be to only set nick after a successful > > NICK > > message was received from the network as Truls suggests. > > Would you mind testing the attached

Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

On 2015-01-28 14:44:52 -0500, Nico Golde wrote: What I think may be better would be to only set nick after a successful NICK message was received from the network as Truls suggests. Would you mind testing the attached patch? Tested, works. Can we still make it log to the network channel,

Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

Hi, * Truls Becken truls.bec...@gmail.com [2015-01-27 08:57]: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Troy Sankey sankey...@gmail.com wrote: If an error occurs changing nick (with /n) then it will become out of sync with the server. Here are some of the consequences: * ii will log outgoing

[dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

Hi, If an error occurs changing nick (with /n) then it will become out of sync with the server. Here are some of the consequences: * ii will log outgoing messages with the new nick, but others will receive them from the old nick * private messaging breaks Conceivably, this issue is common on