Re: Re: [dev] [st][patch] more work on the XEmbed embedder

2024-02-04 Thread Robin Haberkorn
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 06:29:40PM +0100, Страхиња Радић wrote: > > That is how it usually works. Users submit patches, which are provided on > > https://st.suckless.org/patches/ > > and (depending on context) might get merged into the upstream. This > particular > patch doesn't look

Re: [dev] [st][patch] more work on the XEmbed embedder

2024-02-04 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 24/02/04 03:22PM, Robin Haberkorn wrote: > Thirdly, I doubt that the maintainers would want to merge this into mainline. The essence of the suckless philosophy goes hand in hand with the Unix philosophy - programs that do one thing well and cooperate with other programs. st is and should

Re: [dev] [st][patch] more work on the XEmbed embedder

2024-02-04 Thread Robin Haberkorn
04.02.24 12:52, Hiltjo Posthuma пишет: > Hi, > > If you want to contribute to upstream you need to rebase the patches on the > master version of st. > > Then you send the patches (git-format-patch) to the mailinglist. > Okay. But first of all, there are remaining problems. I would like to

Re: [dev] [st][patch] more work on the XEmbed embedder

2024-02-04 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 08:38:46AM +0300, Robin Haberkorn wrote: > Hello! > > I picked up the patch from Jochen Sprickerhof > that was posted on hack...@suckless.org a few years ago, allowing you to > embed applications into st via Xembed. So this is the _host_ side of > Xembed, very similar to