jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2066644940
I like it!! Definitely way better than my change which now seems like a bad
hack 藍 I can close this PR in favor of yours
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jose-galvez closed pull request #720: Re-adding support for fractional seconds
in access log
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2066468644
Please have a look at a different PR which builds on some refactoring I just
pushed: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/721
I think I like mine better.
--
This is an
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2064310044
> Are you specifically talking about the ExtendedAccessLogValve's
`time-taken` token? If so, you're right, that documentation did not change yet
the underlying implementation did
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2063868914
Oh, I'm' sorry I didn't pick-up on the subtleties of your report.
Tomcat 10.1 is documented that the value for `%T` is in (presumably _whole_)
seconds. Tomcat 9 says it's
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2063746801
It can, but in this case the documentation states that it didn't so I was
trying to bring it back to how it behaved before (which as an added bonus helps
us not change our scripts).
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2063733345
So nothing can ever change, then?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061838297
> Why not use `%D` which is in milliseconds (Tomcat <10) or microseconds
(Tomcat >= 10)?
I wanted to keep parity on the behavior here with previous versions,
especially because
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061821679
> From memory that change was to align Tomcat's access log configuration
with httpd. It may well be that the correct fix here is to correct the
documentation. Separately, comparing this
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061771435
Why not use `%D` which is in milliseconds (Tomcat <10) or microseconds
(Tomcat >= 10)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
markt-asf commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061540617
From memory that change was to align Tomcat's access log configuration with
httpd. It may well be that the correct fix here is to correct the documentation.
Separately, comparing this
11 matches
Mail list logo