+1 to release.
Tested on Mac OSX(EI Captitan) and RHEL 6.2 64-bits, results are as follows:
* tcnative 1.2.2 build successful with APR 1.5.2 and openssl 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015
* ant test success
* ant run-echo success
* tomcat 9 (r1712528): all APR test cases pass
* tomcat 8 (r1712899): all APR test
Hi,
I have tested tomcat 9.0.0.M1 on Mac OSX EI Capitan.
The svn link seems broken to me:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcattags/TOMCAT_9_0_0_M1/
Instead, the following url is accessible:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_0_M1/
Environment:
Mac OSX, jdk 1.8.0_51, apr
Following is a step by step guide for those who are interested in trying out
the HTTP/2 feature in tomcat9,
Please correct me if anything is wrong.
Prerequisite:
* JDK8: suppose you've already installed
* tomcat 9.0.0.M1:
Please download from
step by step guide to try out the HTTP/2 feature in tomcat9
On 17 November 2015 00:49:00 GMT+00:00, Huxing Zhang
<huxing@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:
>Chris,
>
>>> NOTES:
>>> * HTTP/2 is not supported for non-secured protocol currently.
>
>> I'm no expert, but I
--
From:Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
Time:2015 Nov 6 (Fri) 20:18
To:Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: Tomcat Native 1.2.2
Huxing,
On 11/5/15 7:08 PM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have solved the prob
Hi kkolinko,
There seems to be a typo in the commit:
+None. Tomcat 6 is Commit-Than-Review since 2015-11-02.
Commit-Than-Review should be Commit-Then-Review.
--
From:kkolinko
Send Time:2015年11月4日(星期三) 23:55
Hi All,
I have trouble running tcnative test under Mac OSX(EI Capitan).
I used the jdk8, apr 1.5.2, openssl 1.0.2d(OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015) to build
the tcnative code in trunk.
I followed the instructions described in native/BUILDING:
Step by step build output is:
1) sh buildconf
Hi All,
I have solved the problem building tcnative on Mac OSX.
The message worth noticing is:
ld: warning: ld: warning: ignoring file /usr/local/openssl/lib/libcrypto.a,
file was built for archive which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64):
/usr/local/openssl/lib/libcrypto.aignoring
e is
something better.
[1]
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/tomcat-8.0.x/tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-bio/index.html
Thanks,
Huxing Zhang
--
From:markt <ma...@apache.org>
Time:2015 Nov 4 (Wed) 18:55
To:dev <dev@tomcat.apache.org
+1 for non-binding.
Testing environment:
RHEL 6.2, JDK 1.7.0_67, tcnative 1.2.2, apr 1.5.2
Test results:
All the test cases of BIO/NIO/NIO2/APR has successfully passed.
Best,
Huxing Zhang
--
From:Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.
+1 (non-binding) to release.
Testing environment:
RHEL 6.2, JDK 1.6.0_22(with jdk.7.home point to 1.7.0_67), tcnative 1.2.2, apr
1.5.2
Test results:
All the test cases of BIO/NIO/APR has successfully passed.
Smoking test based on built-in examples: successful.
Best,
Huxing Zhang
Hi,
There is a typo in commit message.
Log:
Updates (excluding docs) for 8.0.309 release
should be 8.0.30?
--
From:markt
Time:2015 Dec 7 (Mon) 19:18
To:dev
Subject:svn commit: r1718302 -
cases run on Tomcat 9 trunk(r1718838): success
Best,
Huxing Zhang
--
From:Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com>
Time:2015 Dec 12 (Sat) 15:09
To:Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Re
+1 (non-binding) to release.
Testing environment:
RHEL 6.2, JDK 1.6.0_22, 1.7.0_67, jdk 1.8.0_51, apr 1.5.2, OpenSSL 1.0.2e 3 Dec
2015
Test results:
* tomcat-native-1.2.4-src.tar.gz md5 sum: valid
* tcnative 1.2.4 binary build with openssl 1.0.2e: success
* run tcnative ant test: success
* Apr
For those who can't access youtube, you can find the video on youku.com:
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTM5NTU3Mjk2MA==.html
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2015 Nov 25 (Wed) 07:11
To:us...@tomcat.apache.org
+1 for non-binding.
Testing environment:
RHEL 6.2, JDK 1.7.0_67, tcnative 1.2.2, apr 1.5.2
Test results:
All the test cases of BIO/NIO/NIO2/APR has successfully passed.
Best Regards,
Huxing Zhang
--
From:Mark Thomas <
Hi fschumacher,
Just a friendly reminder that I had a discussion with kkolinko about this
before.
I seems that it is better to explicitly define the default value rather than
the Boolean.getBoolean syntactic sugar.
private static final boolean onlyAttemptFirstLoader =
-
+1 for migrating from svn to git.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Jun 7 (Tue) 17:33
To:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:Re: Using modern development tools for friendlier environment for
Hi
The proposed 9.0.0.M8 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M8
No test cases failure.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Jun 8
The proposed 8.5.3 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.3
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.3
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.3
No test case failure.
Examples ok.
Some suggestions:
* Add tomcat 8.5.x to
Looks good. +1
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Jun 13 (Mon) 23:47
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject:Timescale for 8.0.x EOL
Now we have a stable release of 8.5.x, I'd like to finialise the
The proposed 9.0.0.M3 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ x ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M3
* unit test case pass on RHEL 6.2 / mac OS X with latest openssl version
(OpenSSL 1.0.2f 28 Jan 2016)
* tested HTTP/2 on Nio/Nio2/APR connectors, server push example works fine.
* tested
I'm +1 on backport HTTP/2 support to tomcat 8.
I think this should fit into a).
Reasons:
SPDY support has been supported until tomcat 8.0.22, and HTTP/2 is based on
SPDY,
so there should be no problem at Java language level.
Given that:
1. tomcat 8 has already dropped SPDY support
2. there are
Sorry, 9.0.x mirror is already there, I mean the 8.5.x mirror.
--
From:Huxing Zhang
Time:2016 Mar 31 (Thu) 11:03
To:dev
Subject:tomcat 9.0.x/8.5.x github mirror
Hi,
I am
Hi,
I am wondering that is there any plan on setting up github mirror for tomcat
9.0.x/8.5.x branch?
If so, what is the ETA of it?
Thanks,
Huxing
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
8.5.x github mirror
On 31/03/2016 04:08, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Sorry, 9.0.x mirror is already there, I mean the 8.5.x mirror.
It was on the TODO list but I hadn't got around to it. The request just
went in. Follow progress at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IN
Hi,
I got the same failure as the CI build report.
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/tomcat-7.0.x/tomcat-tc7.0.x-test-apr/gump_file/TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.TestClose.APR.txt.html
Rx: NORMAL_CLOSURE
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Rx: NORMAL_CLOSURE
at
Hi All,
I found that there are two release announcement, 6.0.45(2016-02-11) and
6.0.44(2015-05-12) in the following url:
http://tomcat.apache.org/
Is that expected?
Thanks,
Huxing
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I have following observations:
0. in NOTICE it sill mentions the following XML schemas, which I think should
be removed.
- javaee_8.xsd
- web-app_4_0.xsd
- web-common_4_0.xsd
- web-fragment_4_0.xsd
1. When uncomment the SSL/TLS HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 with HTTP/2 and
start
望陶)
<huxing@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.0
2016-03-22 13:31 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva <miles...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-03-22 9:25 GMT+02:00 Huxing Zhang <huxing@alibaba-inc.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
The proposed 8.0.33 release is:
[ x ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.33
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Mar 19 (Sat) 04:55
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject:[VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M5
* The unit test has all passed in my environment.
* Tested the direct HTTP/2 connection support using h2load, it works fine now!
Thanks for the hard work!
The proposed 7.0.69 release is:
[ x ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.69 Stable
--
From:Violeta Georgieva
Time:2016 Apr 11 (Mon) 18:55
To:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:[VOTE] Release
t:Re: Adding tomcat to HTTP/2 implementation list
On 19/04/2016 03:53, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planing to add tomcat to the list of known HTTP/2 implementation:
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Implementations
>
> Before committing, I would like to confirm wi
Hi,
I am planing to add tomcat to the list of known HTTP/2 implementation:
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Implementations
Before committing, I would like to confirm with you guys:
Name: Apache Tomcat 8.5+(http://tomcat.apache.org/)
Language: Java
role(s): Server
negotiation(s):
Hi:
The proposed 9.0.0.M9 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M9
No test cases failure.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Jul 5
Hi
The proposed 8.5.4 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.4
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.4
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.4
No test case failure.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
Hi,
Here is my answer:
I will be attending ApacheCon NA:
[ ] Yes
[ X ] Maybe
[ ] No
If attending, I would be willing to present a session at TomcatCon:
[ X ] Yes
[ ] Maybe
[ ] No
I have submitted a proposal here:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/14951/13401
Any
Hi,
I think the problem is that how we target tomcat 8.5 to the users.
Is it a biased to 8.0, or is it biased to 9.0?
For the former case, we should keep the backward compatibility as much
as possible.
For the latter case, breaking things should be assumable by end users.
IMO, 8.5 should be the
Congratulations and welcome!
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jan 21 (Sat) 01:12
To:Tomcat Users List
Cc:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:[ANN] New committer: Emmanuel
The proposed 8.0.37 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.37
No test failure.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Sep 1 (Thu) 18:57
The proposed 9.0.0.M10 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M10
No test case failure except the following:
[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
[concat]
The proposed 8.5.5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
No test failure.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
The proposed 9.0.0.M11 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M11
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Oct 7 (Fri) 03:52
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
Although it is a bit late, the tc native 1.2.10 example fails with openssl
1.0.2j, following is the output:
Buildfile: /home/admin/tomcat/tcnative/tomcat-native-1.2.10-src/build.xml
clean:
[delete] Deleting directory
/home/admin/tomcat/tcnative/tomcat-native-1.2.10-src/dist
env:
The proposed 8.5.6 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.6
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.6
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.6
--
From:Mark Thomas
The proposed 8.0.38 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.38
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Oct 7 (Fri) 05:19
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
The proposed 7.0.72 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.72 Stable
Test cases ok.
Examples ok.
Our test app works fine.
--
From:Violeta Georgieva
Time:2016 Sep 14
Hi Gavin,
Please file the patch to trunk, and it will be backported to 8.5.x, 8.x if
possible.
--
From:Gavin McDonald
Time:2016 Sep 23 (Fri) 07:17
To:Tomcat Developers List
Oct 9 (Sun) 19:26
To:Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.10
Am 09.10.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Huxing Zhang:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your hint, I think I've found out the root cause.
>
> When I first compile opens
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.8 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.8
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Nov 4 (Fri) 05:52
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
The proposed 7.0.73 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.73 Stable
--
From:Violeta Georgieva
Time:2016 Nov 8 (Tue) 06:15
To:Tomcat Developers List
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M13 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M13
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Nov 4 (Fri) 05:42
To:dev@tomcat.apache.org
.
--
From:Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Time:2016 Oct 8 (Sat) 19:47
To:Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.10
Hi,
Am 08.10.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Huxing Zhang:
...
> [echo] tc.library.
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.9 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as <8.5.8> (should be 8.5.9)
Test case pass.
Our test web app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Dec 6
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M17 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M17
Test case all passed.
Test web application runs fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jan 11 (Wed)
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.11 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.11
Test cases all pass.
Test web application runs fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jan 11 (Wed) 05:28
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M16 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M16
Test cases all pass.
Example web app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jan 6 (Fri) 07:37
Hi there,
I have observed that there are some poller thread properties, e.g.
pollerThreadPriority still remaining in org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Nio2Endpoint
(line 148-150).
I do not see any place that is referring it, and it has been dropped in 8.5.x
and 9.x.
Any ideas why it is still
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.10 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.10
All test cases passed.
Test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jan 6 (Fri) 07:39
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M15 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M15
Test cases pass.
Our test web app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2016 Dec 5 (Mon) 22:47
138,6 +138,9 @@ A complete list of all the Apache Commit
Huxing Zhang (huxing at apache.org)
+
+Coty Sutherland (csutherl at apache.org)
+
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Hi,
The proposed 7.0.76 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.76 Stable
Test cases all passed.
Our test webapp runs fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Mar 9 (Thu)
The proposed 8.5.14 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.14
Test case: ok
Our test web application works fine
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Apr 13 (Thu) 21:13
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M20 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M20
Test cases: ok.
Our test web app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Apr 13 (Thu) 04:20
The proposed 8.5.12 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.12
Test cases all passed.
Our test web app works fine.
One exception. The server push example will be failing by throwing an NPE if
HTTP/2 is not supported.
Stack trace is:
The proposed 9.0.0.M18 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M18
Test cases all passed.
Our test web app works fine.
One exception. The server push example will be failing by throwing an NPE if
HTTP/2 is not supported.
Stack trace is:
Hi
The proposed 7.0.81 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.81 Stable
Unit test passed.
Our test web application works fine.
--
Violeta Georgieva
2017 Aug 11 (Fri)
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.17 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.17
Unit test passed.
Our test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jul 4 (Tue) 16:40
The proposed 9.0.0.M25 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M25
Unit test passed.
Our test web application runs fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jul 25 (Tue) 07:19
Hi,
I've noticed that there is a incorrect tag name "TONCAT_9_0_0_M23" in github
mirror:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/TONCAT_9_0_0_M23
I've checked the svn repo, looks like it has been corrected already:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tags/
It seems that the change in svn
The proposed 9.0.0.M24 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M24
Unit test passed.
Our test web application runs fine.
New feature tomcat-web.xml works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
GNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Huxing,
On 6/20/17 10:48 PM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> These two pdf files are not accessible to me:
> http://people.apache.org/~schultz/ApacheCon%20NA%202017/Let's%20Encryp
t%20Apache%20Tomcat.pdf
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~schultz/ApacheCon%20NA%202
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M23 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M23
Unit test passed.
Our test web app works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jul 4 (Tue) 16:19
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.20 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.20
Unit test passed.
Our test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Aug 3 (Thu) 06:10
Hi,
> There was no concern expressed about the log files that are currently not
> rolled (generally, I suspect, because well written apps won;t trigger content
> to those files).
We do have concerns about rotate the output to stdout/stderr.
In most of our cases, this is due to logging framework
FORBIDDEN for the above links.
--
From:Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
Time:2017 Jun 21 (Wed) 02:05
To:dev <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: ApacheCon slides with .odp extension
Huxing,
On 6/16/17 1:4
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.0.M22 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M22
Unit test passed.
Our test web application works fine.
1. There is a typo in trailers.ResponseTrailers, I will fix that later.
2. Actually I have a concern of the trailer field
[ X ] +1 We should announce 8.0.x EOL for 30 June 2018
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jun 22 (Thu) 23:18
To:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:[VOTE] 8.0.x EOL - 30 June 2018
We had a couple of
ess easier.
--
From:Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Time:2017 Jun 26 (Mon) 17:55
To:Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] 8.0.x EOL - 30 June 2018
On 26/06/17 03:19, Huxing Zhang wrote:
>> The only thing I can think of is lack of support for t
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.16 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.16
Unit test passed.
Our test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jun 22 (Thu)
> The only thing I can think of is lack of support for the BIO connectors.
> I have an easy fix for that if there is interest. Anything else?
Also the RFC6265CookieProcessor. We've experienced several incompatibility
with LegacyCookieProcessor.
For example, cookies with leading dot is no
Mark, thanks for the fix!
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 18:29, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Jun 23 10:29:56 2017
> New Revision: 1799653
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1799653=rev
> Log:
> Fixing typo (r1799648) changed response body length so test needed to be
>
Hi
I have noticed that some of the ApacheCon slides are in .odp format:
http://people.apache.org/~schultz/ApacheCon%20NA%202017/Seamless%20Upgrades%20for%20Credential%20Security%20in%20Apache%20Tomcat.odp
Congratulations!
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 May 8 (Mon) 16:08
To:Tomcat Users List
Cc:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:[ANN] New committer: Michael Osipov
On
The proposed 8.5.15 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.15
Test cases: OK.
Our test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 May 5 (Fri) 19:39
The proposed 9.0.0.M21 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M21
Test cases OK.
Our test web application works fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 May 5 (Fri) 17:03
Hi,
The proposed 7.0.79 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.79 Stable
Unit test passed.
Test web application works fine.
--
From:Violeta Georgieva
Time:2017 Jun
Hi, here is my test result, although the vote has finished:
The proposed 9.0.0.M27 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M27
Unit test passed.
Our web application works fine.
--
Mark
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.23 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.23
* Unit test passed.
* Test web application works fine.
* Tested clean tomcat running under JDK9: ok, but with following message during
stop:
29-Sep-2017 20:36:09.474 INFO [Thread-3]
Hi
The proposed 7.0.82 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.82 Stable
Unit test passed.
Test web application works fine.
--
Violeta Georgieva
2017 Sep 29 (Fri)
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.1 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.1
[ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 9.0.1
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.1
Unit test passed.
Test web application works fine.
Tested clean tomcat running on JDK9: ok
Tested
Hi,
The proposed 8.5.22 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.22
Unit test passed.
Tested on our web application and it works fine.
--
Mark Thomas
2017 Sep 23 (Sat)
+1 to remove the preview packages.
--
Mark Thomas
2017 Sep 28 (Thu) 03:08
Tomcat Developers List
[PROPOSAL] Deprecate and eventually remove the o.a.c.servlet4preview package in
8.5.x
All,
Maven has another advantage that it provides a centralized repository for
dependencies, which can be easily mirrored.
The current build process for Tomcat requires different repositories such as:
- apache.org(mirrors available)
- archive.apache.org(mirrors unavailable, access unstable)
- maven
Hi Martin,
As Mark said, there is something wrong with the text in the mailing list.
I changed the encoding because my laptop (default encoding as UTF-8) complains
with the following error when compiling this class:
Error:(148, 31) java: unmappable character (0xA3) for encoding UTF-8
Hi,
I am wondering that is there any mirror of either of the following links:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.24/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc8.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_8_5_24/
Recently the download speed gets unbelievably slow, (sometimes <1KB/s)...
Hi,
The proposed 9.0.2 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.2
[ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 9.0.2
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.2
Unit test passed on JDK8, but failed on JDK9:
Testsuite:
> It would be safer to use \u for non-ASCII characters in strings to
> avoid depending on IDE encoding preference.
> (\u00A3 for the pound currency character here.)
I agree. I will take that change.
--
Konstantin Kolinko
mcat 8.5.24
2017-11-28 18:08 GMT+03:00 Huxing Zhang <huxing@alibaba-inc.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering that is there any mirror of either of the following links:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.24/
dist/dev has no mirrors, dist/release ha
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo