Sounds good.
Kind Regards,
Corey Stubbs
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:50 AM Luciano Resende wrote:
> I am not suggesting doing "everything" via SBT, just the basic compile,
> test, build and package so that contributors used to other sbt based
> projects fill comfortable
I am not suggesting doing "everything" via SBT, just the basic compile,
test, build and package so that contributors used to other sbt based
projects fill comfortable getting started with the project. For all the
other more optional/complex tasks, I am all for using a set of fully
documented
My typical development flow is to write code, run pip-release , and then
install the pip release locally on my machine (pip install
dist/toree-pip/pip-release; jupyter toree install), and test changes with
the install.
+1 on working on documenting the make targets.
In terms of getting everything
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Marius van Niekerk <
marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think just documenting development workflow and process properly will
> help a great deal.
> Building Toree is a non-trivial exercise sadly.
>
>
Completely agree that is a non-trivial exercise, but should
I think just documenting development workflow and process properly will
help a great deal.
Building Toree is a non-trivial exercise sadly.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 11:14 Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jakob Odersky wrote:
>
> >
Hi everyone,
I was wondering how everyone usually develops toree, specifically how
changes to toree are tested with a jupyter notebook? I couldn't find
any documentation on the website so I thought I'd ask here.
I tried running the various makefile targets, including `make dev` and
`make