Matej Knopp wrote:
I haven't heard a single argument against replacing div/ with
div/div except people being anxious of wicket touching the markup.
The best real argument I know is that I want the HLTM to be viewable
without Wicket.
Of course it is fine to have Wicket provide optional
w00t!
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
did that last night
On 11/2/07, Martin Grigorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let it be IClusterable. please.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ivaynberg
Date: Fri Nov 2 08:37:31 2007
New Revision: 591368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591368view=rev
Log:
On 11/3/07, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
I haven't heard a single argument against replacing div/ with
div/div except people being anxious of wicket touching the markup.
The best real argument I know is that I want the HLTM to be viewable
without Wicket.
I
Matej Knopp wrote:
Fixing this has practical benefits. And I haven't heard one argument
against it except that wicket shouldn't do that because it's html. I
have personally problems with such arguments. It just feels not
pragmatic.
We have three options here:
1. Fix the issue transparently
fixed, parameters are now doubles.
thx for the report...
Gerolf
On Nov 3, 2007 6:41 PM, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about this method in Animator object:
withADSRTransition(int attackEnd, int decayEnd, int suspendEnd, int
sustainLevel)
This method has int
The wicketframework.org domain is now pointing (through a redirect) to
the wicket.apache.org website.
The domain is still registered on my name, and I'm ready to let it go.
The question is: should we keep the domain (register it through the
ASF) or let it expire.
Expiration has the advantage
Keep asking and Gerolf will fail his exams :-)
I think he's looking for excuses to get his head out of the books.
Martijn
On 11/3/07, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fast response ;) really thx a lot
I would like to ask one more question for wicketstuff-animator:
Is there implemented
Though I'm not pro on this change, I suggest putting it in before rc1.
Martijn
On 11/3/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Fixing this has practical benefits. And I haven't heard one argument
against it except that wicket shouldn't do that because it's html. I
have
On Nov 3, 2007 10:38 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Keep asking and Gerolf will fail his exams :-)
I think he's looking for excuses to get his head out of the books.
nah, i've studied quite a bit today and i have 3 more full days to go
(although you're not completely wrong)...
On 11/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I'm not pro on this change, I suggest putting it in before rc1.
Why aren't you pro? Because you don't agree with the idea, or because
it is too late in the game?
Ugh, nevermind.
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 19:28 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The wicketframework.org domain is now pointing (through a redirect) to
the wicket.apache.org website.
The domain is still registered on my name, and I'm ready to let it go.
The question is: should we keep the domain (register it
On 11/3/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I'm not pro on this change, I suggest putting it in before rc1.
Why aren't you pro? Because you don't agree with the idea, or because
it is too late in the game?
Eelco
Done.
-Matej
On 11/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I'm not pro on this change, I suggest putting it in before rc1.
Why aren't you pro? Because you don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
