Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, Recently in my company we moved from TeamCity to Hudson for two major reasons: - Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once) while TC agent can build at most one project at a time - Hudson knows Maven, i.e. after building project X it builds all projects that depend

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
There are some developments unfolding in the near future that might help out on the future of our wicketstuff server and/or its infrastructure. I don't have the full details to those plans yet, and don't know if they entail a build server of some sorts. I'm perfectly happy with switching to

RE: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Steven Tierney
Hi, If anyone is looking for a Wicket contract position in Edinburgh please get in contact. Best regards, Steven Steven Tierney Bright Purple Resourcing Ltd Senior Consultant The Eagle Building, 19 Rose Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PR Office: +44 131 473 7045 (Direct Line) +44 131

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal which is slated to be announced mid-august, so IMO we should not delay the migration off of teamcity and setup hudson. I'll contact the sysadmin for the box to see if I can grant direct access, or that only trusted folks are

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Erik van Oosten
- Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once) while TC agent can build at most one project at a time Just to keep the facts straight: at my company we have several TC agents on one machine. Works without problems. Regards, Erik. Op 21-07-10 09:31, Martin

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Johan Compagner
hudson is just a war right? so that can be dumped by anybody of the wicket devs to onto the tomcat webapp dir. What more does hudson need? On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:14, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying as a war does have some drawbacks: restarting using the UI won't work, installing/updating plugins/new versions of hudson is enabled by default. Martijn On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: hudson is

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread James Carman
This will give you a rough idea of what you need for Hudson. It does need some disk space: http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Administering+Hudson On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Johan Compagner
how do you deploy then? has hudson its container (tomcat)?? Then we also need another port. And have all kind of apache config to support things like: wicketstuff.org/hudson hmm that i dont like. It should just run on the tomcat instance we have. On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:51, Martijn Dashorst

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread James Carman
Here are the instructions for setting it up on linux/unix: http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Installing+Hudson#InstallingHudson-Unix%2FLinuxInstallation You *can* just do: java -jar hudson.war and it'll run. That's just a quick way to get it up and running to play around with it. On

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Johan Compagner
its a FreeBSD server, so dont know if that is all the same that a linux one. But still everywhere i see java -jar hudson.war or hudson start That means that hudson has its own web container right? Where does that run on? which port? Then again also changes to apache must be done to map

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
which is possible, but we should ensure that pranksters won't be shutting down our server... Martijn On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: its a FreeBSD server, so dont know if that is all the same that a linux one. But still everywhere i see java -jar

Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-21 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh
In linux I've been using the screen command like this: screen java -jar hudson.war --httpPort=9090 Then detaching and letting it run. Running it like this is useful if auto update doesn't work and a manual restart is required. Google seems to show that the 'screen' command also exists for

[proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects

2010-07-20 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh
Hello, I've been using Hudson reliably to build wicketstuff core snapshot's and deploying them into the sonatype maven repository. I put together an older machine for this purpose (P4 1.8Ghz) and while it worked at first recently there have been memory issues (at least one of the DDR1 DIMM's