Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-24 Thread Vladimir K
-- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Doubt-about-form-components-tp27693061p27714259.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-23 Thread Pedro Santos
Hi Martin, consider this form: java code: Form form = new Form(form); add(form); final TextFieldInteger textField = new TextField(tf, new Model()); textField.setType(Integer.class); textField.setOutputMarkupId(true); form.add(textField);

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-23 Thread Martin Makundi
Yes.. don't use referenceToModel. Instead call textField.getDefaultModelObject(); ** Martin 2010/2/23 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com: Hi Martin, consider this form: java code:        Form form = new Form(form);        add(form);        final TextFieldInteger textField = new

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-23 Thread James Carman
Or, call modelChanged()? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Yes.. don't use referenceToModel. Instead call textField.getDefaultModelObject(); ** Martin 2010/2/23 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com: Hi Martin, consider this form: java

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-23 Thread Pedro Santos
In the step 3, the user isn't changing the model value, so setDefaultModelObject don't call internalOnModelChanged. The user intent that can be update the component markup will fail, unless he call modelChanged by his own. On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Martin Makundi

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Martin Makundi
Hi! Hi, the form component clearInput method that clean this state is called on the valid method. I'm trying to guess why the form component keep his raw input after an form processing with errors.  I can't figure out why don't clear the raw input in this situation, since on the next form

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Pedro Santos
Hi Martin, thanks for the reply! Hi, the form component clearInput method that clean this state is called on the valid method. I'm trying to guess why the form component keep his raw input after an form processing with errors. I can't figure out why don't clear the raw input in this

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Martin Makundi
Hi! I don't know the original design but if you (e.g., ajax) redraw some components it's goddamn useful to have the raw input. Say that you redraw erroneous components with red border like I do. You would lose the raw value if you clear that and the user would lose the input. Actually this

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Pedro Santos
IMO the form processing can be: 1. validate 2. detect error 3. keep rawinput 4. re-render error components with red border AND rawinput 4.1. throw away the raw input in some detach method 5. user retry form submit 6. all form components get they raw input again since they get rendered

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Martin Makundi
Hi! What's the difference whether it's thrown away or not if the next step is re-submit with new values? ** Martin 2010/2/22 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com: IMO the form processing can be: 1. validate 2. detect error 3. keep rawinput 4. re-render error components with red border AND

Re: Doubt about form components

2010-02-22 Thread Johan Compagner
if a user refreshes the browser or does some other action (go first to another form in another page and back again) then we still can render the latest user output just fine the next time On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 21:42, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: IMO the form processing can be:

Doubt

2010-02-05 Thread Pedro Santos
Why do onClick method from Link is public? Who would want or need to call it from outside? -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos

Re: Doubt

2010-02-05 Thread Erik van Oosten
Perhaps the Wicket framework needs some way to call it ;) Regards, Erik. Pedro Santos wrote: Why do onClick method from Link is public? Who would want or need to call it from outside? -- Send from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/

Re: Doubt

2010-02-05 Thread Pedro Santos
From an instance of what class, other than Link and it subclasses? On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote: Perhaps the Wicket framework needs some way to call it ;) Regards, Erik. Pedro Santos wrote: Why do onClick method from Link is public? Who

Re: Doubt

2010-02-05 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Perhaps in IVisitor? Martijn On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: From an instance of what class, other than Link and it subclasses? On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote: Perhaps the Wicket framework needs some way to

Doubt about wicket ajax

2010-01-22 Thread Pedro Santos
Why do Wicket call abort method on XMLHttpRequest after process it? (wicket-ajax.js line 1001) It doesn't cause any damage, just the response get the error flag set to true. http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#the-abort-method -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos

Re: Doubt about wicket ajax

2010-01-22 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
It's line 1003 in trunk, and associated with commit 518643. So, looking at that commit yields this: svn log -r 518643 r518643 | knopp | 2007-03-15 09:40:44 -0500 (Thu, 15 Mar 2007) | 1 line fixed a problem with ajax