Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1117
What I mean is - as a user, when I auto-complete the interpreter name, I
would expect a suggestion list that contains only interpreter names and nothing
else.
Right now list of suggestion
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
@corneadoug from what you say, it's still not clear what's the plan with
this one.
I do not think it was rebased, where `rebased = git rebase` - that way all
the commits would show up AFTER
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1164
Thanks for the improvement, LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Hi,
Does anybody have a good way to run Selenium tests from command line?
There isn't much documentation about it, and I can't get it to run anymore.
I tried both:
*TEST_SELENIUM="true" mvn package -DfailIfNoTests=false -pl
'zeppelin-interpreter,zeppelin-zengine,zeppelin-server'
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
Thank you for your opinion.
I understood as a story about running redundant during the workflow.
If the current functional design is supposed to run at the same time, as
follows
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
Cool feature, even I wanted to have something similar. Will test it, and
give more feedback, in the mean while, and referring to the gif posted in
screenshot segment, can the rest of the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
@prabhjyotsingh This PR is not passed. Why do you merge it? I think we need
to pass the CI even though we have some flaky tests. Could you please check it
again?
---
If your project is set up
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1160
@corneadoug thanks for the help with rendering list, and i've fixed the
tests. CI is green and ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1181
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1155
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1140
@corneadoug should we merge this, so that, `grunt serve` starts working,
and tune this later ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1172:
Summary: NPE in ResourcePoolUtils when creating remote interepter
Key: ZEPPELIN-1172
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1172
Project: Zeppelin
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1110
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
I have applied `ZeppelinStyle` Java formatter in Eclipse and re-formatted
`ZeppelinServer.java` here is the diff below
```
diff --git
Github user corneadoug closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1177
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user corneadoug reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1177
change the jquery-ui css file name
### What is this PR for?
The Jquery-ui css file name changed between version and is now missing
![screen shot 2016-07-13 at 3 37 02
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1177
@corneadoug I also saw this error in my console. LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
jira re link - ZEPPELIN-1165
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1165
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
@jongyoul do you think we should update our documentation for contributors,
mentioning this IDE setup as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
So what is the consensus, shall we actually *rebase* this one on master and
merge, or just close, as soon as #1171 is merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
Looks great to me! Thank you @lresende
Let's merge if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1164
Documentation review addressed in e432961
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@bzz, I can't recreate the build failure.
I can say
- Spark, pySpark, and Mahout notebooks and paragraphs run as expected.
- Spark and pySpark tests pass. Also, integration
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
Looks good to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
You can either use %hive or %jdbc(hive), for the same.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user babupe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1170
Thanks! I will work on incorporating the feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rja1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
Thanks @prabhjyotsingh. Novice question: how to you make the distinction
in the notebook that you want jdbc hive vs jdbc postgresql, jdbc phoenix, etc..
If I run:
%jdbc
show tables;
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
@Leemoonsoo Yes, I agree, we should merge #1171.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
I missed this (which solve the same problem as
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182), let me check this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
LGTM!
This has been happening in my machine as well for quite some time. Thanks
@r-kamath for the fix.
@corneadoug, @Leemoonsoo Please review will merge this a hot fix.
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1181
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
@r-kamath Thanks for the fix. How this fix is different from #1171 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1182
[HOTFIX] ZEPPELIN-1170 Handsontable fails to display data on second run
### What is this PR for?
Handsontable fails to display data on second run if first run did not
render table due to an
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/8790ba97caf0a08f7d73a3dec6b583f572f18189#commitcomment-18231592
I think this change is somehow related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1169. @jongyoul, could you take
a
Renjith Kamath created ZEPPELIN-1170:
Summary: Handson table fails to display data on second run
Key: ZEPPELIN-1170
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1170
Project: Zeppelin
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1169:
--
Summary: Wrong guava version in the classpath
Key: ZEPPELIN-1169
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1169
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
I'm merging it into master, if there is no further discussions,
verification.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1175
Thanks @zjffdu for the contribution
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1180
This is cool!!
Tested and LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
Thanks @astroshim @corneadoug for review this!
Merge it into master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1177
Test and LGTM.
CI failure doesn't look relevant.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
Looks like there were some network problem on last CI bulid. Could you
trigger ci once again and see if it goes to green?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rerngvit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1077
@elbamos Thanks for your information. I found that moving
"zeppelin-zrinterpreter-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar" to under "interpreter/r" will
resolve the issue and enable the registration process for
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
update to description.
This feature ensures a certain execution order Notebook with each
Interpreter.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1181
ZEPPELIN-1168 Add http header X-Requested-By in post request to Livy for
CSRF protection
### What is this PR for?
Add http header X-Requested-By in post request to Livy for CSRF protection
Renjith Kamath created ZEPPELIN-1168:
Summary: Add http header X-Requested-By in post request to Livy
Interpreter
Key: ZEPPELIN-1168
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1168
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1175
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1180
[ZEPPELIN-1059] Fix the Print CSS file
### What is this PR for?
While investigating the original issue, I discovered that the
`printMode.css` file was never used before.
I changed it
GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1179
[ZEPPELIN-1109] Remove bootstrap dialog fade-in/out animation
### What is this PR for?
This PR will fix
[ZEPPELIN-1109](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1109).
I'm not
Spark would need hive-site.xml be on CLASS_PATH, hence I'd suggest putting a
copy under SPARK_HOME/conf. I don't recall zeppelin/conf is on, and that would
probably be the reason why it wouldn't work.
Do you have the exception stack for %sql not working?
_
From:
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/930
@echarles @bzz So is this Ready for merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1178
[Zeppelin-1167] Group $scope.$on functions
### What is this PR for?
This is a small refactoring PR for zeppelin-web.
This is moving all the code's `$scope.$on` functions together at
CORNEAU Damien created ZEPPELIN-1167:
Summary: Refactoring - Group $scope.$on functions at the bottom of
controllers
Key: ZEPPELIN-1167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1167
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
@AhyoungRyu
It has been completed.
However, if the part you want, please tell us at any time.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
Test description modified.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1162
@bzz CI is green now :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
Great feature!
Can you add documents for this or please explain more detail to review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1177
change the jquery-ui css file name
### What is this PR for?
The Jquery-ui css file name changed between version and is now missing
![screen shot 2016-07-13 at 3 37 02
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
@cloverhearts Is this PR WIP?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
[Zeppelin 1165 : improve] Paragraph dynamic relationship executable form
### What is this PR for?
Through a dynamic form, you can execute the order in para graph.
There is a
CORNEAU Damien created ZEPPELIN-1166:
Summary: Missing Jquery-ui CSS
Key: ZEPPELIN-1166
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1166
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
@corneadoug 413 and 473 "together" are alternative fix for ZEPPELIN-1078
for better performance.
Without 413, applying 473 will bring ZEPPELIN-1078 problem again.
---
If your project
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1172
@corneadoug When I build this PR in my local, i got this jscs warnings.
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/10060731/16793638/7b1dc450-490d-11e6-837d-8f271a40d049.png;>
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1172
@corneadoug more graceful! Thanks for taking care of this ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
@Leemoonsoo I tested again, originally I was testing with previous `||
resultRefreshed`
473 does help the text rendering indeed. However I have the same
improvement without 413 for both
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
@corneadoug I tried more and it looks like slowing down without 413 and 473
change is not consistently reproducible.
Anyway, logically, 413 and 473 change reduce text rendering from
69 matches
Mail list logo
