Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1698
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
@jongyoul let me try to take a step back and try to explain.
Zeppelin is going to be used for various use cases, some of which will
involve HDFS - Hive/Spark/Phoenix/Hbase etc, some use
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
@jongyoul this work is currently solving for AD, but is not limited to it.
Going forward users may choose to store their Hive, Hbase and other data system
passwords. These passwords
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
@jongyoul in that case, they will not be able to take advantage of storing
AD passwords in an encrypted fashion. That said, there will be no functionality
loss.
---
If your project is set up
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
@jongyoul It does not matter, because we are just depending upon hadoop 2.6
credential api's. So if the user is on Hadoop 1.x, then he just needs to add
Hadoop common - 2.6 jars to the classpath
GitHub user rconline opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
[ZEPPELIN-530] Added changes for Credential Provider, using hadoop commons
Credential apis
### What is this PR for?
This is the first step in order to ensure clear text passwords
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1236
@felixcheung i think this will continue to remain a problem, till the time
we allow all user roles to setup/modify these permissions. Unless we can
recognize and separate this as an admin
Github user rconline closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rconline closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user rconline reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
[ZEPPELIN-1149] %sh interpreter kerberos support
### What is this PR for?
Zeppelin Shell interpreter should work in a Kerberos environment
### What type of PR
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1205
LGTM, at some stage we should start thinking about connection pooling. But
that can be a different PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
@felixcheung as of now the interpreters are reusing zeppelin keytab.
Typically this is case in the hadoop security world, where the keytab is
generated at a process level, whereas
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
@jongyoul i think this suggestion makes sense. Its possible that other jdbc
data sources may have security setup via ACL and don't need Kerberos.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
@jongyoul here are some reference - http://linux.die.net/man/1/kinit &
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/unix_commands/kinit.htm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
@felixcheung over a period of time, each interpreter will start to have
their own Keytab's. I think we should have separate keytabs for different
interpreters. We will ofcourse have to invest
GitHub user rconline opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
[ZEPPELIN-1149] %sh interpreter kerberos support
### What is this PR for?
Zeppelin Shell interpreter should work in a Kerberos environment
### What type of PR
16 matches
Mail list logo
